For the record, I absolutely hate dealing with any of these medical issues just to drive a truck. I feel that with all that I've been through in my life, I have to learn as much as I can to avoid having to deal with any issue negativity or to stay clear of people who have their own uneducated or arrogant opinion about the issue (DOT Docs, state carrier enforcement people, dumb GP docs) so I can continue to drive. I have looked at all of this, paid for legal advice and legal research and came to one conclusion - we are a scattered bunch of professionals who don't leverage the power we have to make positive changes in our industry and to prevent many of our fellow professionals from being abused with issues like this. Like me, organisations like the OOIDA choose to pick the right fight to make changes but no matter like those organiations, I am powerless until everyone else joins in on the fight.
I've gone round and round with this and there is a regulation that govern this issue and the use of the guidelines for medical practices that dictate best practices based on the medical panel's decisions. As convoluted as this is, the real issue is it is frustrating and politically motivated (meaning lobbying takes place within the US DOT by doctors) but nevertheless we have to deal with this stuff and have no choice until we start to fight it the right way.
As for the long form, the BMI is an indicator derived from the height and weight, just like a full hearing test, the results are the indication itself that someone is "in danger" of having sleep apnea but derived from those numbers as is someone with a specific type of hearing lost (like SCDS).
If you want to find the regulations and guidelines, look around the office of medical programs on the FMCSA site, by the way I think 49 cfr 391.41(b)(5) addresses the sleep apnea issue on the regulation end of it while the guidelines cover what is a "respiratory dysfunction".
Well I would think the medical suppliers are not the one's making the money, it is the clinics themselves - talked to a clinic owner who figures his profit margin is three digits. The sleep study isn't phoney, it is real and more to it than just watching someone sleep but overall I agree that this isn't really an issue as much as other things like HOS induced stress and an unstable US DOT.
That I disagree with you on, the 'mega-fleets' have less of an incentive to deal with this stuff because they derive their revenue from the revolving door and anything that stops or slows that door down hurts them in the long run. Having a driver who is medically dependent on a machine and its use hurts them when they try to force them to take a sleeper break so to adjust their hours in order to keep the truck moving.
That tax isn't yet here and may end up going away because of the fact it will hurt the US manufacturers a lot. BUT under Obama care, it may be more difficult to get a job without having the test seeing medical records privacy and work related medical issues could be disclosed to future employees to mitigate regulatory issues they come up with in the future.
Absolutely we are the ones who lose in this entire mess. I see one thing that has to be changed and we need to actually step up and force the change, maybe through a coordianted effort with the OOIDA and even the teamsters (maybe that's a bit of wishful thinking) - we need a law and not a regulation that simple closes two important loopholes that allow abuse -
1 - the DOT registered physician has to accept the results of a test or tests for any number of things by a treating physician without further testing for the DOT physical. This will eliminate some of the "well you had that test but I'm not satisfied with what your doctor has been doing for you so you need to get another test" (been there done that). The treating physician should be the tests to be taken before any tests that the DOT doc wants who sees you maybe once in your life.
2 - with that the 'mega-carrier' can not force you to see one of their docs if you pass a dot physical. I know of one carrier who has an in house doc and his failure rate is something like 60% on the first go around for new drivers. The driver has to pay for each retests and he has other medical tests done at clinic he works out of, getting kick backs on each one. So if a driver goes to a general clinic and get a pass on their physical to drive within months of starting a new job, the carrier has to accept that dot physical and any physical that is done outside of the carrier.
Lying about sleep apnea?
Discussion in 'Motor Carrier Questions - The Inside Scoop' started by amtrack, Mar 29, 2013.
Page 8 of 10
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
-
-
MoGooder Thanks this.
-
-
No need to feel bad for me, while I would be red flagged if I went to one of those companies I don't have any problems sleeping and I dream quite frequently.
Maybe some day it will be regulated, maybe not. -
Sleep apnea is nothing to mess around with and you certainly don't want lie about it..... you don't think that in this era, that the fact that you were already diagnosed with it at another lab, that it won't pop up in the future? I understand that it probably doesn't effect you as much because you sleep on your side, (which usually doesn't obstruct your air way). AND, in any event, I know you don't want to plow into a family.
CPAPs now have a slot which you put a data card ( a camera memory card) which records your sleep, In general, if you are 70% complient you will pass DOT regs.
Don't fight it........ you just need to get a machine and use it.truckerdad57 Thanks this. -
Yep...a driver was found dead in his truck in horse cave,Kentucky...he had a cpap but he wasn't using it
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 8 of 10