I would suggest that they move backwards, at least they'll know where they've been instead of moving ahead and trying to figure out where in hell they're going.
The future of Delete Kits
Discussion in 'Canadian Truckers Forum' started by Sarabeara, Dec 27, 2013.
Page 2 of 4
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
Runawayscreaming Thanks this.
-
From what I have heard the biggest target so far has been suppliers of delete kits to Diesel pick up trucks but I am of the belief that it will spill over into Commercial vehicles before long. If you want to do it just be prepared to undo it. Not saying you will have to but it needs to be accepted as a risk.
I have looked at the emissions requirements as a need to re-evaluate the business model. Reliabillity isn't there and the only solution to that is to have a back up plan or accept re-powering a load. For me that is having access to a spare truck when something is being serviced (I haven't had any emissions related problems, service time is the bigger issue both to get in and to actually have something fixed). I work in an environmet where I can't say I will deliver it tomorrow as everything will come crashing down, in the summer it will all fall apart if I can't be there by 10AM.
I have access to a shared spare truck which works great but it isn't outfitted for pneumatics so requires blowing off a trailer at a time. When I start to replace my fleet in a few years I will be keeping one as my spare. It might only get used a day or two a month but that is the price of customer service that I have to be willing to pay. For a single truck a full service lease may make more sense. I think that is the other issue that most owner operators are realizing now. They are still working on a model that worked 10 or 20 years ago. That you can buy a truck and run it for 10 or 15 years. While I hope that my trucks will last that long I will be ready to replace them every 5 years (not that I will if they are running great). I don't believe there is an owner operator truck out there anymore. They are all fleet trucks, meant to be replaced in 5 years and meant to have dozens in the yard in case something goes wrong. Sure the hood trucks are still marketed towards the owner operator but underneath that hood is the same parts as everything else out there.
Sorry I got off topic. I won't delete on my trucks It is because I remember as a kid seeing the clouds of black smoke coming from trucks. I know that is what the public and politicians remember as well. I know that deleting them won't lead to that but they won't see it that way and it is an image the industry will not be able to overcome. Especially when the fleets with the money all run new trucks with emissions requirements, their incentive is to make everyone out there run under the same conditions they do.not4hire Thanks this. -
First, because I felt like I really shouldn't have to. Somebody has GOT to fix this truck. My 2013 (knock on wood) has been running extremely well now for about 10 weeks. I ended up purchasing another truck recently. A 2013 Volvo 630. I bought it used from my finance company, it was one of their repos.
I've never owned a Volvo, but have heard good things - so here is hoping.
My husband wanted to put it to work and hire another person. But if we do that, we could end up in the same predicament as we have been. Unable to fulfill our commitment to our carrier. Its a great idea to "share" a "spare" truck. I never thought of doing that.
I've had many people who have told me to get rid of the new trucks and just go back pre-def. And although their advice was asked for, I didn't feel like it was the right card for us.
I think the responsibility should fall directly on the dealers and manufacturers. As it seems, they just point their finger at each other, and I don't get good answers.
There is definitely a lack of accountability. The problems would be much easier to cope with if somebody would just take responsibility.
I hope that government officials do see that these new emissions protocols may look "prettier" with lack of smoke being emitted, but they seem to ignore the chaos they cause to the small business owner.
Its all smoke and mirrors! -
More responsibility needs to fall on the manufacturers but sadly that won't happen. I believe a lot also comes from too fast of time lines to implement the various emissions technologies over the last 10 years and I have never gotten the sense that the companies were getting a head start rather hoping that the government would back off and unfortunately we are the ones to pay the price.
One of the reasons I went with the Volvo/Mack engine is they were the first to my knowledge to go down the DEF route so have spent a bit more time figuring it out. When I first started researching I was very confused to what route Cummins was taking because the number of press releases and articles about how they didn't need to use DEF and those were around until 2009 if I am remembering correctly so they really only spent a year on it before they publically changed their minds and put out their first DEF engine. I think Volvo had their first ones running in 2008 or 2009 so have a year or two more testing than Cummins.
It will be interesting to see how the Volvo holds up. I would run which ever truck is more reliable as that one will make/save you the most money. If it turns out that it is better to use the pete as a spare than as much as it would be dissappointing to do it I would switch them out.
I did look at pre-EGR trucks but my issue with them is they are now 10 years old. And it is the parts other than the engine that are going to cause you headaches, and on some trucks you might be looking at the second overhaul on the engine, not for me a full time truck in my opinion. A truck lasts a lot longer pulling 80k in the states than 140k in the prairies, so to find one in good reliable condition seemed to be near impossible let alone three. -
Prairie Boy Thanks this.
-
Re: Spares
I think the new (unfortunate) reality is that fleets both small and large must have spares they never had to have before. -
Volvo has a DPF system while Paccar has a DEF which stands for Defacator System . No doubt it is Crappy.
Last edited: Dec 30, 2013
Runawayscreaming Thanks this. -
http://www.trucknews.com/news/speci...ering-of-emissions-systems/1002145949/?&er=NA
This will be just a matter of time, a few articles on TV, calls to MP's by enviromental groups, I read some place where gliders 12.7's were being turned back at the border , anyone heard of this???
That would be quite the experience, stopped, system checked, new truck with old motor installed on purpose, they then shut down your "new" truck... -
Gliders come WITHOUT a motor and you install a rebuilt when it gets into Canada.
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 2 of 4