Fuel Saver Alternator

Discussion in 'Trucks [ Eighteen Wheelers ]' started by Dice1, Jan 22, 2014.

  1. Dice1

    Dice1 Road Train Member

    1,315
    609
    Jul 1, 2011
    Bessemer City, NC
    0
    Just installed a new fuel saver Alternator from Delco Remy. It is the 36SI that is 170 amps and is brushless that should save on fuel.Anybody else using one of these?
     
  2. Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.

  3. d281833

    d281833 Heavy Load Member

    881
    919
    May 15, 2012
    0
    Yes I just put one on as well but couldn't say if it saves fuel or not. What voltage range does yours run at? This one of mine runs 14.1 to 14.4.
     
  4. Richter

    Richter Road Train Member

    4,090
    1,700
    Feb 13, 2012
    Philadelphia Pa
    0
    I upgraded to a bosh 200 amp long haul extreme. MPG seemed to go up by .2 or so. Truth is replacing a failing alt in general could cause mpg to go up a little.
     
  5. Dice1

    Dice1 Road Train Member

    1,315
    609
    Jul 1, 2011
    Bessemer City, NC
    0
    Mine is in that range with my AGM batteries. I also have a Maxwell ESM to start truck.

    I agree and a failing alternator with the bearings trying lock up will hurt the MPGs. The brushless version has no parts touching like a brushed one does that would create drag and friction. Every little bit of MPG improvement adds up.
     
  6. king Q

    king Q Road Train Member

    2,880
    3,032
    Jul 26, 2010
    Johannesburg sa
    0
    I'm not sure that this will save fuel.
    The reason is that the only reduction in drag will be from elimination of where the brushes contact the commutator.
    Brushes are usually a carbon graphite substance with a very low friction coefficient and the contact area is small and with low pressure and therefore little drag.
    I assume the brush less alternator uses induction rather then the physical contact brushes to convey the electrical power from the rotating armature to the stationary electrical outlet.
    This is a less efficient means and thus would more then negate the gain in efficiency from removing the friction from the brushes.
    I could just be guilty of being skeptical or perhaps there is new technology I'm not aware of but those are my thoughts.
    We used brush less alternators in the 80's in flameproof machinery.
    They were less efficient in converting mechanical energy to electrical then std alternators.

    Please let us know what your experience is.
     
  7. Dice1

    Dice1 Road Train Member

    1,315
    609
    Jul 1, 2011
    Bessemer City, NC
    0
    Will post results that I am sure will be better because my 5 year old alternator had been failing for a couple of months dragging my fuel mileage down. It locked up tearing the belt up of all places the shop where it was being serviced.

    Brushless technology has advanced a lot in the last 10 years. The electric radio controlled hobbies industry has almost completely switched from brushed to brushless motors in the last 5 to 10 years due to advancements in brushless technology. I used to race RC cars and brushless motors were a lot more efficient, had less heat and would last a lot longer than any brushed motor.
     
  8. Dieselwrangler

    Dieselwrangler Light Load Member

    128
    92
    Oct 16, 2011
    Edmonton, AB
    0
  9. Prom Night Dumpster Baby

    Prom Night Dumpster Baby Medium Load Member

    646
    473
    Jan 12, 2012
    Bug Tussle, TN
    0
    The resistance from the electrical field is what robs power. If you want better mpg by choosing an alternator then get the lowest amp one you can find. 135 amp maybe.

    And keep your batteries fully charged. I hate to agree with Dice but graphite brush drag is practically too miniscule to measure.
     
  • Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.