N.Y. wants to get trucks on Interstates

Discussion in 'Truckers News' started by Cybergal, Jun 17, 2008.

  1. Cybergal

    Cybergal Road Train Member

    6,272
    2,399
    Oct 20, 2008
    0
    N.Y. wants to get trucks on Interstates
    6/17/08
     
    old-six-pack Thanks this.
  2. Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.

  3. old-six-pack

    old-six-pack Heavy Load Member

    757
    82
    Oct 24, 2007
    vernon hill, va
    0
    i'll watch my rate- miles for newyork loads.
     
  4. CMoore2004

    CMoore2004 Road Train Member

    1,119
    110
    Nov 2, 2007
    OTR
    0
    Isn't that what the state highways were designed for? Isn't that why our fuel tax goes to paying for these state highways? If people don't like the traffic on state highways, they should be the ones to find an alternate route. We're not the dangerous ones, THEY are the ones that make traveling any road dangerous.
     
  5. rixcamp

    rixcamp Light Load Member

    220
    30
    Jun 4, 2008
    seligman,az.
    0
    easy way to solve that problem-don't go to New York! that way we truckers wouldn't clog up their precious roads. We can add that to the list of growing as*%$## states!
     
  6. reilley

    reilley Bobtail Member

    40
    3
    Aug 16, 2007
    CNYS
    0
    Truck traffic regulations drafted


    By Nate Robson / The Citizen
    Wednesday, June 11, 2008 11:27 AM EDT
    Gov. David Paterson announced on Tuesday that regulations aimed at reducing large truck traffic in rural communities had been drafted and would be sent through the formal rule making process.
    [​IMG]

    If the regulations pass a roughly six-month review process, the state Department of Transportation would require trucks 45-feet or longer to use interstate highways as primary routes.

    Trucks would be allowed to leave the routes to stop for gas, food, to get to access terminals, to make repairs or to rest.

    The regulations, which are aimed at limiting environmental risks and reducing noise pollution and traffic, would be subjected to public scrutiny to determine if any other changes needed to be made before the measures were implemented.

    Skip Carrier, director of communications for NYSDOT, said one issue he expected to be raised would be the economical impact.

    "I think a big thing with this draft is that we acknowledge the commercial and historical use of the roads," Carrier said. "We are looking at all the parts, residential, business and trucking. Our approach is a different way to do the economical things while not putting our picturesque settings at a disadvantage. It will be a balance and we will need to discuss how we will do it."

    Several transportation companies and industry representatives voiced their concerns after Paterson originally announced, during a press conference in Skaneateles last month, that he intended to push for trucking regulations. Many industry advocates feared the restrictions would place trucking businesses under economical stress due to factors such as high gas prices and a slumping economy.

    NYSDOT will also encourage cargo transportation by freight train and will work with other state and public authorities to ensure that large trucks are efficiently using the interstate highways.

    The regulations also called for the implementation of traffic calming initiatives to restrict or slow down traffic, such as reduced speed limits, street narrowing projects and bike lane markings.

    These initiatives will be available for Finger Lakes tourism destinations which NYSDOT deemed to be high traffic areas, Carrier said. A total of 15 locations have been declared eligible for the measures and more locations could be added to the list as research continues.

    "Most of those areas on the list are located on state roads so the state will pay for the work," Carrier said. "Sometimes the municipalities will have to pay, but they could get federal eligibility which would cover 80 percent of the costs."

    Aurora Village Trustee George Farenthold, who is also the vice president for the Upstate New York Safety Coalition Task Force, said UNYSCTF had constantly been at the forefront of the trucking issue in rural communities.

    "I have been anxiously awaiting the NYSDOT's draft of the rules," Farenthold said. "We have been trying to bring this issue to our state and federal officials and now I believe they fully understand the concerns of our village, town and county officials."

    While he praised the regulations, Farenthold said his organization was aware that more work needed to be done to find a balance that would allow the trucking industry and the residents to be happy.

    "One of the details yet to be vetted will be balancing industry needs versus the needs of local residents," Farenthold said. "We have never been anti-trucking or anti-trucker. We are pro-safety, pro-quality of life, pro-environment and protective of our infrastructure. You can put a price tag on the infrastructure but the safety and quality of life are priceless."

    Staff writer Nate Robson can be reached at 253-5311 ext. 248 or nathan.robson@lee.net

    Potential traffic calming areas in Cayuga and Onondaga counties

    Municipality Route Speed Limit(MPH) Length(Miles) From/To AADT *

    City of Auburn 20 30 1.4 East city line to end of 5/20 overlap 10,000

    City of Auburn 38 30 4.0 Southern to northern city lines 4,300

    Union Springs 90 30 1.4 Southern to northern village lines 2,200

    Cayuga 90 30 1.2 Southern to northern village lines 2,300

    Skaneateles 41 30 0.5 South village line to U.S. 20 2,100

    Skaneateles 41A 30 0.6 South village line to U.S. 20 3,300
     
  7. woodstock36

    woodstock36 Medium Load Member

    565
    75
    May 17, 2008
    NY
    0
    Ahh New York state S**** anyway!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:biggrin_2552:
     
  • Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.