I’m surprised no one has asked about the op engine. Do you have a glider or did you mean c-15?
Cascadias with dd13 and dd15 mpg
Discussion in 'Ask An Owner Operator' started by pavrom, Dec 16, 2018.
Page 3 of 4
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
-
I've had 3 Cascadias. A 2017 lightweight with the dd13/auto I used to get mid 8's mpg. Smaller engine but when heavy it strains more. (was new truck)
2018 Cascadia with dd15/auto my average was 8.5mpg but I drove 60mpg 90% of the time. (New truck)
2016 Cascadia dd15/10speed I'm getting a average of 7.5mpg. Doesn't seem to matter if I drive 60-65 I have a very hard to e hitting 8mpg like I did with the autos. (439k when I got it)
I'll say straight up you will not hit 8's running 70mph but when you can save that much money by slowing down if you have the time, isn't it worth it?Last edited: Dec 20, 2018
-
Surprisingly I slowed down to 60-61 from 68-70 and I got 7.1 no matter what load I was pulling , I did Chicago to Atlanta 26k lbs , haul back 6600lbs and 46k steel Chicago to charlotte nc ...every time over 7mpg wow
-
-
Generally, the lower the ratio, the better the fuel economy with a modern engine. The big factor being how big of a load you hauling on a consistent basis and at what speeds. -
-
But there is a limit to how low of a ratio you can go and still be able to launch the truck fully loaded on a hill without burning out the clutch. Startability.
It’s all about compromise.gekko1323 Thanks this. -
Dave_in_AZ Thanks this.
-
Truck with a higher ratio has to turn more rpms. More rpms means more fuel used.gekko1323 Thanks this.
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 3 of 4