550 cat fuel economy?s

Discussion in 'Trucks [ Eighteen Wheelers ]' started by 2hellandback, Mar 30, 2009.

  1. 2hellandback

    2hellandback Heavy Load Member

    978
    237
    Dec 19, 2007
    Blackfoot Idaho
    0
    What kind of fuel economy can i see on a 1999 W900L 550 hp CAT 3:70 rears at 1400 rpm/ 65mph? And where may the sweet spot be (RPMs)?

    I should add pulling a full load.
     
    Last edited: Mar 30, 2009
  2. Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.

  3. 24valve puller

    24valve puller Medium Load Member

    399
    89
    Sep 8, 2007
    N.E. Oh
    0
  4. dirtyoldman

    dirtyoldman Light Load Member

    264
    70
    Dec 30, 2007
    None of your business
    0
    i run a peterbilt with a 550cat same gearing, I get 5mpg if i run loaded at 65 but I am a car hauler, so not aerodynamic and always 80+k

    Not much help I am sure.


    BTW if you want fuel economy, dont buy a w900. You neet a T700 volvo or freightliner.

    Stacks, air filters, windshield visors, and flat front surface area kill mileage.
     
  5. JSmitty

    JSmitty Light Load Member

    288
    52
    Feb 22, 2009
    Midland Tx
    0
    I'd venture to say 4-5
     
  6. 2hellandback

    2hellandback Heavy Load Member

    978
    237
    Dec 19, 2007
    Blackfoot Idaho
    0
    LOL it will be an alloy tanker, 7-7500 gal
     
  7. HISPEED428

    HISPEED428 Light Load Member

    157
    21
    Mar 28, 2009
    Plum Coulee,MB
    0
    My 02 550 averaged between 5.5-6mpg pulling a reefer.When I sold it # 923000 miles ecm average was 5.6mpg lifetime.I had 3.70 rears and an 18 DO.70mph @1500rpm is what it seemed to like best.24.5 tall rubber
     
    Last edited: Mar 30, 2009
  8. 2hellandback

    2hellandback Heavy Load Member

    978
    237
    Dec 19, 2007
    Blackfoot Idaho
    0
    My ? then would i be better of going 3:55 or 3:36 and a cummins 475 or 550 hp and i like 900L or 379 petes(I think they may ride better) looks but i can live with T-600 just cant live with the volvo look.

    OH forgot to mention buying used and im sticking to pre egr.
     
  9. HISPEED428

    HISPEED428 Light Load Member

    157
    21
    Mar 28, 2009
    Plum Coulee,MB
    0
    Engine wise it's personal preference.I won't buy anything but CAT.Rear ratio would depend on on what size tire you plan to run.My personal experience with the older Cat's is 1500rpms # whatever speed u plan to cruise at.
    I can figure it out but I need to know your transmission ratio in the big hole and your tire size.
     
    Last edited: Mar 30, 2009
  10. 2hellandback

    2hellandback Heavy Load Member

    978
    237
    Dec 19, 2007
    Blackfoot Idaho
    0
    13 spd or 18 spd,,, and possibly but not likely a 15 spd .

    I would like to keep best fuel economy i can get at 65-70 mph so im thinking 3:70s then with 24.5 hi or LPs . its just stuck in my head most economy is at 1300 -1400 rpms.

    Preference for 900Ls /379s But i have to consider what's going to make the money also, thus T-600s.

    Weight will always be at max or over. ALSO i get paid by the ton so truck weight is a factor also.
     
    Last edited: Mar 30, 2009
  11. HISPEED428

    HISPEED428 Light Load Member

    157
    21
    Mar 28, 2009
    Plum Coulee,MB
    0
    1325 rpm at 65 mph is for the Acert Cats according to Caterpillar if GCW is 80000lbs or less.1500-1650 at cruise speed if GCW is 90000lbs or more .3406E Cats like to run about 1450-1550rpms.When I switched to a company that had a 65mph speed limit my mpg's went down.I changed from 24.5 tall to 24.5 lo-pro and changed the revs per mile in the ecm to 500 to bring my rpms's back up.

    If I were you I would be lookin for an 02 flattop Pete with a 6NZ Cat.If mine would have been a flattop I would still be drivin it.
     
  • Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.