Iam leased to a large carrier. When the e-log mandate was announced the operations v.p. sent a fleetwide message about gow great this was for them, that they could finally have a "level playing field".
Ok so if you have over 2,000 in just on of youre company fleets, what playing field needs leveled? They haul cheaper and gross ove $600 million dollars! I think the playing field has been shifted to theyre side for a long time.
This has come about because of lobbying by the ATA, mothers against tired truckers. and public citizen ( those last two get large amounts of funding from the railroads). Ole U.S. politics at its best, he with the most money wins.
1,000 miles per day on E-logs
Discussion in 'Trucking Industry Regulations' started by EZX1100, Mar 19, 2014.
Page 2 of 7
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
its level for them because they can haul cheaper because they pay their drivers 30cpm and get a LOT of freebies with it
what Owner Op wants to work for 30cpm?
even 50cpm is unacceptable, so you get slew of company drivers willing to work for 30-40cpm, which on a 3,000mi week is about $1,000 before taxes
i have always wondered why mega millionaires cannot have their salaries capped, but working men can
so that $600mil profit is because they pay their workers as little as they can, they get fuel breaks, tire breaks so its much easier to make a profit when you pay your people peanuts
too many drivers are willing to work for peanuts and will gladly call you an outlaw if you dont bow down to corporate interestsJoetro and Toomanybikes Thank this. -
Don't be silly. Anyone driving 85 who can't miss rear-ending a 62 mph truck shouldn't be driving 85 in the first place, and a truck going with the flow of traffic or faster has a fool at the controls.
-
a truck should not be going with the flow of traffic? and youi have the nerve to infer someone is a fool?
every study has shown less accidents happen whnen traffic speed is uniform, hence states are doing away with split speeds
except in your mind and mega safety managersToomanybikes and x#1 Thank this. -
It's not "inferred".
Post a link to 1 such study... why not make it the fully discredited Solomon (1964)?
It's not a matter of fewer crashes, it's a matter of fewer truck crashes.... you know, the most catastrophic kind, and "best practice". In traffic it is difficult if not impossible to maintain an adequate following distance. A few mph slower than the flow mitigates that, and decreases stopping distance. There can be no argument about that.
I firmly believe 75% of the 75% of fatal 4-wheeler/truck crashes found to be solely the fault of the 4-wheeler (AAA, 2002) could have been entirely prevented by the truck driver.
Right. The people who know what they're talking about, that you can't understand due to the Dunning-Kruger effect.
You seem to have a simplistic view of your responsibilities as a truck driver. "Professionals" recognize a responsibility to protect oblivious motorists from their obliviousness. Can't do that if you're oblivious.Last edited: Mar 21, 2014
Dinomite Thanks this. -
i found your twin
http://www.layover.com/forums/layov...split-speed-limits-cause-accidents-19082.htmlx#1 Thanks this. -
Fascinating. Keep looking, I'm sure you'll find that study any day now.
-
We don't drag discussions across forums.
Don't forget tire ratings. Half of you don't know what speed rating your tires have.
-
Faster speeds only work in favor of o/o or cpm guys. I'm hourly so I wish they'd reduce the national speed limit back to 55. Save fuel, less accidents, and I'd make even more money! Win win win!
Buckeye91 and SlowPoke44magnum Thank this. -
I don't know what that means.
Interesting point. IIRC it is only recently (~2000, maybe?) that any "truck" tire was rated above 65 mph.
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 2 of 7