2014 MACK CXU613 or 2014 INTL PROSTAR

Discussion in 'Ask An Owner Operator' started by kwan2323, Jul 30, 2018.

  1. Edjahman

    Edjahman Medium Load Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2013
    Messages:
    648
    Thanks Received:
    444
    0

    Yeah I hope so because I'm really fed up with Cummins and their problems.

    We called them Come-Aparts back in the early 90's lol.

    I'm pretty stoked about the Mack. We'll see!

    Thank you!
     
  2. AModelCat

    AModelCat Road Train Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2015
    Messages:
    29,206
    Thanks Received:
    159,122
    Location:
    Canuckistan
    0
    He claims his Macks will out-pull an ISX of the same power rating hauling similar weights.
     
    Edjahman Thanks this.
  3. Edjahman

    Edjahman Medium Load Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2013
    Messages:
    648
    Thanks Received:
    444
    0

    Interesting. Thank you for the information.

    I haven't driven a Mack since they came out with the CH model back in the 90's so we'll see. Back then it was a 300 Mack motor with a 5 speed Mack Trans. It actually ran pretty great for what it was.

    I really enjoyed that tractor.
     
  4. roadtech

    roadtech Medium Load Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2010
    Messages:
    391
    Thanks Received:
    920
    Location:
    Northeast
    0
    The Mack is a better truck. I’m surprised that ISX made it to 400k without an inframe. When I see Prostars all I think is throw away mega fleet
    Junk. I would definitely buy the Mack out of those 2 trucks.
     
    650cat425 Thanks this.
  5. abyliks

    abyliks Road Train Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2010
    Messages:
    3,888
    Thanks Received:
    9,090
    Location:
    ludlow MA
    0
    I would not wish either of those two toilets on my worst enemy
     
    650cat425 Thanks this.