would this be a problem? It's kinda odd, makes me wonder if it's accurate. It's got 36k rears, 12k front axle and a 298" wheelbase
48,000 gvwr?
Discussion in 'Ask An Owner Operator' started by sharpshooter, Jan 9, 2011.
Page 1 of 3
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
That is one heavy truck. The only thing that would be good for in my opinion is running oversize loads.
-
Those rears a lightweights for heavy haul. I doubt that is the tare weight. It still seems low on gvwr though. Many I've seen are in the mid to high 60's. With such a long wheelbase it is a truck with limited usefulness.
-
Are you sure about the rears??? Most are at least 38k rated.... what make/model are the axles?
-
here's a link. they got the sleeper size wrong so, maybe the rears too.
http://www.truckpaper.com/listingsdetail/detail.aspx?OHID=2609179&dlr=1
I went to look at it but, it's behind the fence so I couldn't get to close -
The style of door handle on the truck in the picture hasn't been used since 2002. I don't belive that the truck shown is a 2005. My 2003 has the newer style door handles. -
It's got the old style doors with the wing window, instead of the daylight doors. Both were an option and I'm assuming since the doors are old style so are the handles.
-
KW does have an 82" studio sleeper, those one had the couch as a standard item in the bunk didn't they?
I would think that since it is a W900 the rears would be #46,000. -
Yea, that is a Studio Sleeper. Nice looking truck. A little on the heavy side but I'd take one.
-
Why would anyone name their dealership as such?
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 1 of 3