Anti-rollover devices

Discussion in 'Trucks [ Eighteen Wheelers ]' started by 54Trucker, Aug 6, 2014.

  1. Richter

    Richter Road Train Member

    4,090
    1,700
    Feb 13, 2012
    Philadelphia Pa
    0
    Ad agree that auto trans and power steering make you a less attentive driver, but having a safety feature that you dont use (air bags, crumple zones, abs) shouldn't make you less attentive. It should just save u if u do use it. I dont drive my 2004 golf with crumple zones, airbags, auto trans etc. with any less attentiveness then my 88 jeep wrangler with none of those safty features.
     
  2. Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.

  3. Pedigreed Bulldog

    Pedigreed Bulldog Road Train Member

    7,737
    14,422
    May 7, 2011
    0
    Anything that reduces the hurt associated with screwing up takes away the incentive to not screw up. YOU may not drive differently, but that just tells me that you aren't like most. Increasing the cost of inattention will invariably lead to less inattention on the roads.
     
  4. wore out

    wore out Numbered Classic

    15,944
    192,939
    Jun 5, 2013
    CHASIN THE DEVIL'S HERD
    0
    I have to agree I haven't driven a truck with the stuff on it, I have driven a mack with disk brakes only not the other supporting systems and did not like the disk brakes alone. I will say I could see adding to them may make them better than just the disk alone. I will also add that mechanics not willing to learn the new technology and want to convert it back only add to the problem.

    That was really meant as a snicker sort of comment not to be taken seriously. You are right about another assumption I have been in three funeral processions with my truck I hope never again. The thing is to be serious hauling live animals not tied down when myself or the truck tries to guess there shift after a counter maneuver its not gonna be pretty I assure everyone of that. The only way to avoid it is avoid that counter maneuver all togather.

    I didn't see that reply as an attack on my personal skills at all but more of a compliment.
     
  5. daf105paccar

    daf105paccar Road Train Member

    6,564
    7,293
    Apr 15, 2012
    0
    I haul liquids,mostly in unbaffeld tanks.
    Aldough it isn't at first sight similiar to bullhauling,we both haul loads that have movement.
    And that movement can be "fun" at times.
    In my case the effect off the surge can be compared to rearending another truck at 10mph.
    There is a actual "bang" that you can hear.
    And before any "supertrucker" says you can drive so you don't have that ....................i say BS.
    You can drive to limit it as much as possible but not eliminate it.

    As a example ,this afternoons load:
    6364 gallon off Triethylene Glycol
    in a open bore tank that is 8189gallon big,with inside the tank from front to back around 27feet.
    59524lbs off load for a gross off 95460lbs
    The liquid has more then 22% off free space to move around inside the tank.

    If you do flatbed ,the best i compare it with is loading a coil suicide(eyes off the coil to the side) that is just shy off 60 000lbs and it being able to roll 20 feet to the front and back with it falling off.
    And then somebody tell me you can drive that without a "bang". :biggrin_25526:

    You haul stuff like that,you want the best equipement money can buy.

    Now can i drive it old style?
    I can,i did it in the past but why take the risk?
    Maybe old style is cheaper but i value my live more.

    Having said the above,
    old style driving skills are the best to learn
    The safety features are (like others have also mentioned) a extra.
    They don't replace basic driving skills.



    @wore out:that's a mighty fine Pete you have. :biggrin_25514:

    ps diskbrakes without ABS or EBS,i agree they don't work good on a truck.
    It's a package deal.

     
    wore out Thanks this.
  6. walstib

    walstib Darkstar

    You mean brakes?
     
  7. wore out

    wore out Numbered Classic

    15,944
    192,939
    Jun 5, 2013
    CHASIN THE DEVIL'S HERD
    0
    I wanted to make the liquid to live animals analogy but never having hauled it I couldn't be sure. I agree they would be very similar. I could see the liquid being a little harder to control cause after all it has no solid properties or a brain to say oh snuff. Lol. Thanks for the compliment on my ol girls I'm very proud of both of them. Keep your brakes cool
     
  8. 54Trucker

    54Trucker Light Load Member

    288
    226
    Sep 4, 2013
    0
    I've driven twenty years without an accident and without any anti-rollover device. I've driven mostly vans and a few years with a tanker. My philosophy is safety is first, meaning slow down when you are unsure, pull over and sleep when you're overwhelmed with fatigue..

    But we all know how things are today, everyone wants their freight yesterday, and when we do arrive on time then we end up waiting anyway, it's clearly a hurry and wait scenario every time. Are the grocery stores not always fully stocked? ..is it such a bad thing for the shelves to be empty every once in a while?

    I really don't see the need for a device that might put the driver in legal jeopardy. There are an enormous amount of liars out there due to laws that leave the driver fully responsible for his consequences allowing the carrier to abuse him in every way since the carrier has no legal consequences what-so-ever.

    There are a some of you who advocate for this system and compare it to the airline industry, but you fail to take into account the physical area for correction is in inches and feet for trucks while planes have miles. So what is the real purpose of this system? is it really for 'safety' or are they setting the precedent to set the driver up for prison?

    And/or are they setting the precedent for driver-less trucks? which at this point I hope they do it since driving a semi is nothing but hell, constantly being pressured to run 70 and if that wasn't bad enough being pressured to violate the 14/70 to make boss hog man happy. The 14/70 aren't even human or what can be defined as civilized..

    And it's all being done in the name of greed ( a major vice ) so like the few before me I am at the point of going into another part of the industry like truck sales (?) dispatching I would never do because I would never put a fellow driver in a position of legal jeopardy even if I didn't like that driver. I sill have a sense of honor towards my fellow countryman.

    I guess, I'm just learning about this.

     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 9, 2015
  9. 54Trucker

    54Trucker Light Load Member

    288
    226
    Sep 4, 2013
    0
    I've driven Eisenhower pass late at night several times in snowstorms without having the trailer kick out an inch. It was my driving skills that got me (and the truck) through those storms. How would this ESC/RSC system (whatever those acronyms may stand for) done any better?

    I never seen the need for ABS (anti braking system-?) it also takes away from driver control. But I assume ABS (taking away driver control) TADC is where it originally started.
     
  10. SHO-TYME

    SHO-TYME Road Train Member

    3,425
    3,179
    Apr 20, 2011
    Dahlonega, GA
    0
    ABS stands for Anti-LOCK Braking Systems, they don't let the wheels lock up and KEEP you in control. We at B.R.A.K.E.S like to say that ABS stands for ABility to Steer. if you've never tried ABS on a vehicle, it's pretty amazing, it won't stop you any faster, but it keeps you in control.
     
    54Trucker Thanks this.
  11. 54Trucker

    54Trucker Light Load Member

    288
    226
    Sep 4, 2013
    0
    I would think the driver is in more control when he decides to lock his brakes or not lock his brakes.
     
  • Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.