Attorney video if surrounded by a mob

tscottme · Jun 21, 2025 at 3:25 PM

gentleroger said: ↑

Bull. Pure, unadulterated bull.

Even if Fox didn't jump on it, the various infotainment podcasters would.

But let's say you're right. He won a court case, which means he could share the case number and we could read the transcripts.
Click to expand...

When was the last time you posted a case number in support of "common knowledge" you believe?

And would you accept stories from "infotainment podcasters" as proof of an event? Of course not. There is a cover-up industry, a denial industry, and they only accept info from the sources they control who have a history of cover up and denial, like the NY Times or CNN.

tscottme · Jun 21, 2025 at 3:27 PM

Tb0n3 said: ↑

Oh sorry my bad. Did I tell you about the time I saved 10,000 people from falling off a cliff? The news didn't cover it because they're biased but it's real I swear.
Click to expand...

So you don't need genuine sources for you to say something? We knew that already.
The source shell-game is not about getting accurate info, it's about changing the subject, running out the clock, or prolonging the argument.

Tb0n3 · Jun 21, 2025 at 3:30 PM

tscottme said: ↑

So you don't need genuine sources for you to say something? We knew that already.
The source shell-game is not about getting accurate info, it's about changing the subject, running out the clock, or prolonging the argument.
Click to expand...

It seems the sarcasm went over your head. A claim was made for one side. No source was given, so mine is equally proven. If you believe the guy shot a man trying to pull him out in a mob, then you should take my claim at face value as well. If not, then why not? I find it quite unusual that we haven't heard about this supposed mob murder situation in the news, especially Fox which would run this story for years.

gentleroger · Jun 21, 2025 at 7:27 PM

tscottme said: ↑

When was the last time you posted a case number in support of "common knowledge" you believe?

And would you accept stories from "infotainment podcasters" as proof of an event? Of course not. There is a cover-up industry, a denial industry, and they only accept info from the sources they control who have a history of cover up and denial, like the NY Times or CNN.
Click to expand...

This isn't about "common knowledge".

This is about a specific event that happened to a member. Another member then claimed that there would be no news articles due to "censorship".

I responded "bull", and pointed out even if this event was somehow completely missed by all media (unlikely), the member claimed that he won a court case (including legal fees), thus there is a trial record that could be posted as proof.

I do not doubt that the member was threatened and had to take action to defend himself. I doubt that he was threatened by a "mob" during mass civil unrest.

tscottme · Jun 21, 2025 at 7:46 PM

gentleroger said: ↑

Blocking a street does not threaten your life, it inconveniences you.
Click to expand...

That's what Reginald Denny thought.

gentleroger · Jun 21, 2025 at 7:50 PM

tscottme said: ↑

That's what Reginald Denny thought.
Click to expand...

One incident from 30 years ago doesn't create a pattern.

tscottme · Jun 21, 2025 at 7:51 PM

gentleroger said: ↑

This isn't about "common knowledge".

This is about a specific event that happened to a member. Another member then claimed that there would be no news articles due to "censorship".

I responded "bull", and pointed out even if this event was somehow completely missed by all media (unlikely), the member claimed that he won a court case (including legal fees), thus there is a trial record that could be posted as proof.

I do not doubt that the member was threatened and had to take action to defend himself. I doubt that he was threatened by a "mob" during mass civil unrest.
Click to expand...

Yes, there are always reasons why some detail means the point made by someone else is totally different from what can be called relevant by the Cafe Society. We accept that. We are used to that. It's institutionalized in most of society. Case number #45873/2908-3

tscottme · Jun 21, 2025 at 7:56 PM

gentleroger said: ↑

One incident from 30 years ago doesn't create a pattern.
Click to expand...

"Hey Leroy, your brains leaking onto the pavement are not part of any wider pattern, the guy on the internet said so. Pick that stuff up and I'll drive you to the fire station. Maybe they can pour that stuff back into the hole."

tscottme · Jun 21, 2025 at 7:57 PM

gentleroger said: ↑

One incident from 30 years ago doesn't create a pattern.
Click to expand...

Bricks smashing brains is a well established pattern. Can I have your permission to plan to stop it?

roundhouse · Jun 22, 2025 at 11:54 AM

gentleroger said: ↑

Your point? Also, please remember that the people who stopped the attack and drove Denny to the hospital were black.

As to your other remark - these are two very different situations.

Brown v Board of Education was decided in 1954. In the same year, Arkansas announced it would take immediate steps to comply with the decision. In 1957, the Little Rock School Board unanimously voted to desegregate the schools. On September 2, 1957, Governor Faubus called out the National Guard to 'maintain order', when in reality he had ordered them to prevent the black students from entering the school. The School Board voraciously condemned the Governors actions and Eisenhower invited Faubus for a meeting on September 14, where Faubus indicated he would comply with desegregation. Faubus removed the National Guard and allowed the segreationists to riot when the black students attempted entry on September 23. The Little Rock Mayor asked for Federal intervention, which occurred on September 24. The entire Arkansas National Guard was Federlized and told to sit down and shut up while the 101st was deployed to keep order. When the 101st deployed, it's black soldiers were initially held back to avoid escalation.

The Ice raids and ensuing protests started on June 6. On June 7, Trump sent in the National Guard over the objections of the Police Chief, the Mayor, and the Governor.

In the first situation, the initial response was to attempt deescalation by not attempting to send the black students to school. This was followed by communication between the various government entities over 20 days before Federal intervention at the behest of local officials. In the second, one day passed before the President attempted to instill martial law over the objection of local officials in order to allow Federal officers to engage in actions which are legally questionable (at best).
Click to expand...

The elected officials in California have repeatedly said they have no interest or obligation to enforce federal law

So now the fedgov IS actually enforcing the law and the D’s in California are mad about it

weird how no one cared when the fedgov
Locked American citizens in cages for
Deleting the emissions garbage from their diesel engines..

Log in or Sign up

Forums

Find Trucking Jobs

Attorney video if surrounded by a mob

tscottme Road Train Member

Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

Wait, employers can't reach you!

tscottme Road Train Member

Tb0n3 Road Train Member

gentleroger Road Train Member

tscottme Road Train Member

gentleroger Road Train Member

tscottme Road Train Member

tscottme Road Train Member

tscottme Road Train Member

roundhouse Road Train Member

Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

Wait, employers can't reach you!

Log in or Sign up

Useful Searches

Find Trucking Jobs

Attorney video if surrounded by a mob

tscottme Road Train Member

Wait, employers can't reach you!

tscottme Road Train Member

Tb0n3 Road Train Member

gentleroger Road Train Member

tscottme Road Train Member

gentleroger Road Train Member

tscottme Road Train Member

tscottme Road Train Member

tscottme Road Train Member

roundhouse Road Train Member

Wait, employers can't reach you!