First question: why are they so much more expensive than your "common" trucks. I'm talking about ones with the same specs even. I mean there isn't a whole lot of difference between a 389 and a 386 it seems. Same interior, same sleeper, same engine and drive (we'll assume). The 389 just has the steer axle set farther forward, a long hood, and a little chrome. Still it doesn't seem like that justifies so much more money.
Next question, is the ride of a 389 smoother than your typical setback axle truck. We'll use the 386 as a comparison again, since that's a truck I'd consider too. It seems to me, with the steering axle farther away, you're going to be shielded from the bumps more. Kind of like riding in a boat, the roughest ride is when you sit at the bow!
Next, you just don't find 389's with sleepers on fleets. The used ones on the market will have most likely been owned by individuals, right? And if that's the case, they would have been treated much better, and probably maintained better too!
If I bought a used 389, it would have to be one with a DEF system. I live in Phoenix, and I get a lot of freight to/from CA. I heard 2010s are to be avoided, first year of those systems had too many issues. Do you think I'd be alright with a 2011? I want to keep my payments minimal so that I don't have to run too hard. I'm not into trucking purely for the money. For me it's sort of like living the RV lifestyle. In fact I was considering buying an old class A rv. But you know, an old Winnabego would probably get 8 mpg, and not even make any money to offset the fuel and maintenance costs.
I plan on pulling 53' dry vans or reefers. And I'd probably just lease on with a large carrier. I like having terminals where you can park your rig or drop a trailer. Plus the larger carriers have plenty of other drivers when you need time off.
Anyway I got off track there. Back to the Ppeterbilt questions, thanks!
Basic Questions about Peterbilt 389
Discussion in 'Ask An Owner Operator' started by wbound_I10, Mar 17, 2016.
Page 1 of 4
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
Take a ride in one. That should answer all your questions.
scottlav46 and wbound_I10 Thank this. -
TMC runs some 389's. There's more but I'm drawing a blank right now
-
Steelcase still runs older 379's. Western Distributing Transportation Inc still runs a lot of 389's. The ride really is better in a 389 than it is in a 386. Not saying a 386 ride is bad but there is a difference.
-
The Pete salesperson will tell you that you'll get that money back on resale......
Also I know you said same spec but a lot of the 389s are 550/ 18 or 2050 etc those things add up fast. -
They are the same price new (plus or minus air filter housings)
-
If you're asking these questions it's probably best to stick with the 386. Easier to turn.
-
There really is no comparison to the ride quality and stability.
The other factor is that the 389 is the last of the true classic Petes. A vehicle is worth what ever someone is willing to pay for it. Its a beautiful truck and people who like that style will pay more to have it.
386,.. while not a bad truck and better suited for many of the same things, does not offer the same ride or status that a 379 or 389 does.
Its like comparing a Chevy Tahoe to a Cadillac Escalade. Other than cosmetics,.. they are for the sake of argument,.. the same thing. Yet people will happily pay twice as much for the Escalade.
Hurst -
I'll take a 386 to a 389 any day. My body can handle a spring/torsion cabover all day every day, and looks don't pay the bills. I've got a buddy with a 389 and it's been torn up twice because of its poor turning radius. Doesn't look so hot with a broken fender and wrinkled bumper.
Hurst Thanks this. -
It didn't get torn up because of its turning radius. It got torn up because your buddy doesn't know how to make turns in it.
leftlanehammer84, Roadrum, SL3406 and 13 others Thank this.
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 1 of 4