Didn't think they would let you. Knew it was restricted but didn't know if it made any difference being that long. Only added a few miles I'm guessing. Lol
Big Loads - Post Photos Number 2
Discussion in 'Heavy Haul Trucking Forum' started by truckdad, Aug 3, 2015.
Page 521 of 940
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
Quick Question...
Do you gentlemen know what the weight rating would be generally speaking on the parts that project between the tires on an RGN trailer?
These guy were extremely cautious loading this scraper, seems they could have done it quicker but I can respect that than did it as they did.Attached Files:
-
-
cke, IH Truck Guy, SAR and 2 others Thank this.
-
catalinaflyer, cke, Feedman and 8 others Thank this.
-
JD, it looks like had they moved it forward so the rear tires were on the next bolster forward, and been able to put the can down lower that the front may have lifted enough to clear the neck. Is that possible, or would they have had to block the front tires up? -
-
My thought was... They should have loaded it the opposite way based on their trailer configuration. Operting weight on that unit is 90,xxx lb. (google / ritchiespecs) consequently I would think in California the spread between the tandems and the jeep would allow them more weight toward the front than the quad would in the rear. (I could be wrong that's why im hear attempting to learn.)
However its very surprising to hear that he would be over 80k on his quad with a 90k 627. 627's must be really rear end heavy.cke Thanks this. -
catalinaflyer, cke, Oxbow and 1 other person Thank this.
-
As far as weight that G model in the first and third picture I posted is 77,000 on the quad setting on the second bolster like it is so I’ll guarantee it’s over 80,000 setting on the third bolster. My new trailer I’m 82,000.
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 521 of 940