Cascadia exhaust question

Discussion in 'Freightliner Forum' started by Wild Murphy, Jun 14, 2015.

  1. Wild Murphy

    Wild Murphy HAPPY TRUCK DRIVER

    942
    779
    Mar 25, 2014
    0
    I have seen Cascadias with a stack on the back and Cascadias with the exhaust coming out under the back. Is this from different years? Can you convert from having a stack to the other way? Also, any reasons to prefer one over the other?
     
  2. Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.

  3. Grumppy

    Grumppy Trucker Forum STAFF Staff Member

    3,175
    11,083
    Dec 11, 2010
    West Monroe, La
    0
    I've got a 2015 & the exhaust is under the vehicle. I am assuming its just another way to reduce wind drag & increase fuel mileage to comply with government regulations. :dontknow:
     
    Wild Murphy Thanks this.
  4. Dr_Fandango44

    Dr_Fandango44 Road Train Member

    1,053
    746
    Aug 27, 2012
    Austin, TX
    0
    I'm sure you can have it converted. I have a '15 Cascadia EVO and its underneath. I'm sure the explanation is that it's for aerodynamic reasons, and a space saver. Heck there isn't even an easy access to place a simple antenna for a radio.
    Good luck
     
    Wild Murphy Thanks this.
  5. RSQ20

    RSQ20 Medium Load Member

    The reason for the stack is to get the fumes above the 4 wheel traffic...

    ... Philip
     
    Wild Murphy Thanks this.
  6. sdaniel

    sdaniel Road Train Member

    5,511
    4,420
    Sep 7, 2011
    Pelham N.C.
    0
    They went to the weed burner , it saved about 300 lbs.
     
    Wild Murphy Thanks this.
  7. Boardhauler

    Boardhauler Road Train Member

    1,732
    3,670
    Dec 21, 2008
    Ballin' in it for Shakey
    0
    I converted mine to a weed burner with no issues.
     
    Wild Murphy Thanks this.
  8. Wild Murphy

    Wild Murphy HAPPY TRUCK DRIVER

    942
    779
    Mar 25, 2014
    0
    What kind of time and cost?
     
    tucker Thanks this.
  9. mhyn

    mhyn Road Train Member

    4,255
    4,515
    Dec 29, 2008
    Northridge, CA
    0
    don't convert it. you will have a little higher output pressure reading. the acm and 1-box is calibrated for short exhaust pipe.
     
    Wild Murphy and 25(2)+2 Thank this.
  10. 25(2)+2

    25(2)+2 Trucker Forum STAFF Staff Member

    18,756
    45,804
    Sep 18, 2006
    the road less travelled
    0
    The older ones with a 60 Series were more likely to have a stack although I have seen newer and older both ways.

    The stack tended to scorch during regens with a 60 series, and I think all Cascadias had DPF.

    Mhyn makes a valid point, the whole apparatus is calibrated to perform with a specific configuration of exhaust plumbing.
     
    Wild Murphy Thanks this.
  11. Wild Murphy

    Wild Murphy HAPPY TRUCK DRIVER

    942
    779
    Mar 25, 2014
    0
    I agree. There isn't a real issue for me to convert it. Just wondering if it could be converted and any legit reasons why. Thanks.
     
  • Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.