I have seen Cascadias with a stack on the back and Cascadias with the exhaust coming out under the back. Is this from different years? Can you convert from having a stack to the other way? Also, any reasons to prefer one over the other?
Cascadia exhaust question
Discussion in 'Freightliner Forum' started by Wild Murphy, Jun 14, 2015.
Page 1 of 2
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
I've got a 2015 & the exhaust is under the vehicle. I am assuming its just another way to reduce wind drag & increase fuel mileage to comply with government regulations.
Wild Murphy Thanks this. -
I'm sure you can have it converted. I have a '15 Cascadia EVO and its underneath. I'm sure the explanation is that it's for aerodynamic reasons, and a space saver. Heck there isn't even an easy access to place a simple antenna for a radio.
Good luckWild Murphy Thanks this. -
The reason for the stack is to get the fumes above the 4 wheel traffic...
... PhilipWild Murphy Thanks this. -
They went to the weed burner , it saved about 300 lbs.
Wild Murphy Thanks this. -
I converted mine to a weed burner with no issues.
Wild Murphy Thanks this. -
What kind of time and cost?tucker Thanks this.
-
don't convert it. you will have a little higher output pressure reading. the acm and 1-box is calibrated for short exhaust pipe.Wild Murphy and 25(2)+2 Thank this.
-
The older ones with a 60 Series were more likely to have a stack although I have seen newer and older both ways.
The stack tended to scorch during regens with a 60 series, and I think all Cascadias had DPF.
Mhyn makes a valid point, the whole apparatus is calibrated to perform with a specific configuration of exhaust plumbing.Wild Murphy Thanks this. -
I agree. There isn't a real issue for me to convert it. Just wondering if it could be converted and any legit reasons why. Thanks.
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 1 of 2