I know the rules.
But I also have seen and dealt with companies that WILL NOT fix some little thing on the road. Let's get it back to our yard. I know my position on it. I went to pick up a trailer once with no lights. The company told me to run during the day and not worry about it. I refused, they said they would call someone else.
You are probably going to tell me that you have NEVER done something like this. But it is your story, I will let you tell it what ever way you want.
CSA may save your future/job.
Discussion in 'Experienced Truckers' Advice' started by dancnoone, Jul 3, 2010.
Page 8 of 10
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
We have 2 trailers sitting on yards now. I refused to pull both, just this past week.
Both loaded with appointments. Guess those ETA's are completely screwed.
The first occurred on Tuesday, it was still there Saturday morning. -
No I have refused to pull equipment that was deficient. I will on occasion if the risk is low (clearance light, flat on empty or light trailer......) drive short distances (5-10 miles) to a shop for repair instead of waiting for a service truck or losing a high dollar load. Major flaws (flats on heavy loaded trailers, wheel seals, no functioning lights) sit until repaired.
But my point is a driver can do that. There are specific regulations telling him to do it. And any company that would attempt a violation of those regulations is not worth a good drivers time. -
Still sitting there?
The company has not done anything to fix them? -
Probably waiting for the wrong(right) driver to get there and deliver them
-
Yup, still sitting there. No fault of the company...per se.
We had a mass shortage of shop personnel this week. One heart attack, one death in the family, and at least 2 more out sick.
It wasn't a good week to be working at the shop. All the pissed off drivers waiting in line LOL
But they are hiring technicians. Want a job ? -
No. The commute would suck.
-
The source that you just sent me is full of gov. double speak. It tells you absolutely nothing about what they are going to do. They have changed this thing 4 or 5 times already. In one place the say they are not going to use who is at fault in a crash, and then 2 or 3 paragraphs down they say they are. As I have said before I am out of it and the more I see Of csa 2010 the more glad I am
-
Your assertion was that good or clean inspections were useless. I posted the source that disproved that statement.
While hard to follow, this is the source of the program that yes is evolving as it is implemented. A database of this size and scope is going to need to be adjustable at launch.
All that being said spotlighting those that consistently receive deficient marks in inspections can not be a bad thing. Will it remove every sub-standard driver? Sadly no, but it will remove a large portion. -
I would wager, 5-10% of the drivers removed, will be good drivers.
Unless you know of some magical way to insure that an inspected light will remain operational for your entire trip......bingo.
I sure as hell don't want to be running TX at night anymore.
And you can toss some fairy dust enhanced statistical information. But the truth is, lights do go out regularly. Even with good drivers.
The 3rd or 4th light to get you tagged over a 24 month period, will reflect a "bad" habit you have, of not checking your marker lights while driving down the road at 65 mph.truckerdave1970 Thanks this.
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 8 of 10