Dash cam maker claims driver facing cameras prove driver did the right thing

nevermind

 

Insurance companies can choose which companies to cover and companies can choose which insurance providers to use. Both choices have consequences.

Each of us has a duty to seek the best conditions for us. Let the other people fight their own battles.

 

All it will take is one accident with a huge settlement for the other party and then all the sudden driver-facing cameras won’t be a good idea anymore.

 

The pictures of what happens in a wreck must be pretty horrific or all these companies will be posting them on YouTube.

 

This is exactly the truth and the reason why they should not exist.

The outward camera shows your response and what happened. There is nothing more needed beyond that. If you did the right thing it will be obvious if you did the wrong thing that will be obvious.

The inward camera is just food for a shady lawyer to Feast on.

 

And I also mentioned that Swift started with both views, then disabled the driver facing camera.
Why did they do that?
Was it only because they were losing experienced drivers, or were there also other reasons?
They never explained exactly why, so I can not say.

The point is, we no longer have spycams. Only forward facing proper dash cams.

 

I"ll agree with you all on the face cameras. UN NEEDED.

But let's not forget that Arizona cop that was hit by a trucker with his cell phone flying out of his hand as he hit the cop. That was all caught on candid camera. (Face)

 

Think of the tax dollars saved though. Hard core evidence all on camera.