Downsize HP's

Discussion in 'Ask An Owner Operator' started by D16, Jul 30, 2007.

  1. BobC

    BobC Medium Load Member

    409
    57
    Jul 8, 2007
    Cincinnati, slOhio
    0
    I performed the same tests as KD5 but using a Mack Ch600 series with the Mack E427 & super ten.

    Luv'd that truck even though it took 40 acres to turn it.

    Pulling food grade tankers all 48 & Can.
    Always somewhere around 79,900 or empty.

    Company gutted these trucks back to a 350 (or less maybe) & 67mph.

    At their settings best I could do was 5mpg give or take a decimal point.

    I "snuck around" the computer on mine which gave me a triple digit truck.
    It also gave me back the power.

    After all was said & done, I was consistantly seeing 6-6.5 even out west where I typically ran.

    The company remained unconvinced because the salesmen & the garage chief didn't want to look like idiots for recommending the guttings.
     
  2. Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.

  3. Brickman

    Brickman Trucker Forum STAFF Staff Member

    12,907
    12,209
    Sep 17, 2006
    WY
    0

    Run 60-65, it'll do even better.
     
  4. MACK E-6

    MACK E-6 Moderator Staff Member

    48,799
    225,672
    Sep 19, 2005
    Baltimore, MD
    0
    Well, that depends on his driveline, doesn't it?
     
  5. D16

    D16 Light Load Member

    188
    8
    Jul 11, 2007
    Vancouver
    0
    3.73 ratio,18 speed Eaton Fuller.:biggrin_25522:
     
  6. rjparker

    rjparker Light Load Member

    66
    25
    Feb 26, 2007
    NH
    0
    I'm always looking to improve the fuel milage also, my truck has a 400hp cummins and an eaton 10speed, 355rears. I travel at around 60 to 62 mph, ( Swift drivers pass me, makes them happy) :biggrin_25519: I am usually between 75k and 79k when I leave and am seening consistant numbers of better than 7mpg, usually around 7.2 or 7.3.. until I get up into New England, then it drops to around 6.5. Still not shabby in my eyes.

    I took a load of paper products (72k) tues from Saratoga Springs NY to Jersey City NJ and was seeing around 8.3.

    I short shift the low side at around 1100, 1200rpm and the high side at 1300, 1400rpm, I also keep a very large distance between me and the people in front of me. This alows me to slow with my jake brake and not mash the foot break, I run my cruise as much as possible too,

    My best I've seen yet was 9.0, hauling an empty reefer back to the yard from home. ( Central NH to Front Royal, VA) although it took me about my whole 11hrs to do the run. (Usually I do it in 10hrs). Empty my truck and reefer weigh 40k.

    My parents have a 33ft fifth wheel camper they haul with a 96 dodge dually with a Cummins and auto transmission. The best he can get is around 10 or 10.5 mpg.

    I could probably do much better if I raised my hp up a bit, but for now I'll keep them where they are.
     
  7. D16

    D16 Light Load Member

    188
    8
    Jul 11, 2007
    Vancouver
    0
    The main problem for 90% of owner-operators(I'm in this number too)-not enough patience to keep 55-60MPH cruise speed.For me problem is-1.I paid by mileage.2.Truck easily going 80-85MPH.:biggrin_255:
     
  8. RNGTransport

    RNGTransport Light Load Member

    134
    19
    Jul 13, 2007
    Allendale, MI
    0
    My dad gets about 7.3 MPG with his 99 Western Star with a 550 cat 3406e and 13 speed easton. He gets around 13mpg bobtail and 10-10.5 pulling empty reefer.

    I put 2000 miles on my truck this week and have averages around 6.75-7 mpg with idleing
     
  9. BobC

    BobC Medium Load Member

    409
    57
    Jul 8, 2007
    Cincinnati, slOhio
    0
    As an aside to the mpg comparisons; You need to take into consideration where your fuel came from.

    More importantly, how warm was the fuel you put on.

    As many already are aware, there's been great debate & legal activity in Congress & courtrooms over "hot fuels" being sold throughout the states.

    I believe you can attribute some of those decimal points of worse mpg to the temperature of the fuel being too warm.

    I thought of this when you presented a worse mpg in New England. I recall that much of the fuel there is brought in by ship thru New Haven Terminal, pumped into tanks & distributed by underground pump lines throughout New England. Naturally there's local fueling for gas stations coming out of their as well.

    I am pretty sure that the fuel in the super tankers is still pretty warm from the manufacturing process. It doesn't get a chance to cool very much, if at all, while in the tank farms. Plus, when you JetLine the fuel underground it gets warmer from the compression process taking place in those lines. Together, I think the fuel is well above the 60' temp that it is characterized & sold at.

    I recently read how much less "bang for the buck" you get from warmer fuels & although I don't have that spec in hand, I do recall it was several tenths worth of mpg per tankful.

    Just something extra to consider when you make your mpg tests & comparisons.
    rtc
     
  10. rjparker

    rjparker Light Load Member

    66
    25
    Feb 26, 2007
    NH
    0
    I am unsure of this "hot fuel" debate. I have noticed for years though, that outside air temps play a big part in fuel economy. In my personal vehicles, and my big trucks I seem to get my best economy when it is in the upper 60's usually between 68 and 72 degrees outside. Also my economy is much higher at night than during the day. This probably has something to do with air density, humidity, barometric pressures......

    My mpg drops when I head for New England because of the routes I drive. Usually I take I81 north to Scranton PA, then across I84. Lots of hills to climb and I usually have to drop 2 or 3 gears to pull them.

    I tried this week going across I78 to New Jersey, and north on I287 and I684 to I84 and noticed that I got 6.1mpg. Usually it's 5.8 or 5.9 by going the other way I listed.
     
  11. 25(2)+2

    25(2)+2 Trucker Forum STAFF Staff Member

    18,750
    45,476
    Sep 18, 2006
    the road less travelled
    0
    The hot fuel debate isn't that easy, modern engines bypass hot fuel from inside the heads, especially Cummins and Detroit with their unit injectors and high bypass of fuel. Volvo and Mercedes have a setup that admits less fuel and uses most of it up, keeping the fuel in the tank cooler. When running farm tractors, you bypassed hot fuel into the tank causing the remaining fuel to expand. You thought you were getting great fuel economy if you ran an hour or two and measured the fuel used to refill. but more like you expected if you ran the fuel down most of the way before refueling.

    I just switched into a truck with an ISX; the fuel in the tanks is noticeably warmer than with the Detroit I drove before, warmer than the N-14s I used to drive. I seemed to be getting better fuel economy by the gauge but I will have to refuel a number of times to tell for sure.

    We are supposed to refuel at one of the major truck stops in Perrysburg, Ohio, the fuel there is warm. One of the older drivers kept careful records and now refuses to fill there saying he was jeopardizing his mileage bonus by doing so. I believe him.
     
  • Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.