First time I ever had to call the cops on another trucker
Discussion in 'Experienced Truckers' Advice' started by IROCUBabe, Sep 28, 2008.
Page 10 of 10
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
yeah, I know. DOT sets minimums, if the company wants to stiffen up, it's their right. I was just doing what truckers do best: kvetching. Not to mention driving from the back seat.
-
It is sad though. I knew more about logs and the law than the lady in charge of them. I asked about recording fuel stops within 15 minutes when we fueled and so forth. She had a blank look on her face.
About 2 months later, the DOT was in to explain it all to her. That is when it hit the fan. -
lol, I'll bet.
Compliance should at least have the basics down - and should only run into problems when the question gets unusual (say, when asked if Jury duty should go on line 1 or line 4) -
-
Look, I was using my truck as an example. Everyone's sweet-spot will be a little different, I gave you the mileage that I get at those speeds. Adjust it for your truck, and the math will show the same savings. The point isn't what "speed" you go, it's what fuel mileage you get for that speed. But then, I think you know that, and are just trying to be combative, because you don't want to slow down to YOUR sweet-spot.
If they can "afford" to run that way, then why are they complaining about fuel prices? Slow down, and keep some of that money in your pocket. If i could manage to get 8 mpg, then I would be getting free fuel, because the surcharge would pay for it all!
You will also have traffic lights, hills, and other traffic to contend with while getting back up and moving again. I am not talking about parking along-side the high-way. I am talking about moving from parked location to the highway, then getting up to speed. You are "supposed" to log the drive time getting back on the highway too, not just the time you are "at speed."
If anything, I was being too conservative on the 60 and 65. -
If they did and their trucks were governed at 68 m.p.h. , when they bought new trucks the past few years they would have spec'ed those trucks to run most efficiently to run at 68 m.p.h. . There is no way you could later turn those trucks back to 60 m.p.h. and improve fuel mileage . That's the case with trucks in our fleet .
Saying a FSC would pay the total cost of fuel is ridiculous . When fuel costs go down or fuel mileage increases the FSC should be lowered accordingly .
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 10 of 10