Is it worth the investment for the Fleet Air Filter?

Discussion in 'Trucks [ Eighteen Wheelers ]' started by RTR, Dec 27, 2014.

  1. russtrucker

    russtrucker Road Train Member

    1,767
    337
    Mar 27, 2012
    Central PA
    0
    Same with me. I would have the cascadia for my dad and have kw glider.
     
  2. Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.

  3. Chris50

    Chris50 Medium Load Member

    346
    215
    Jun 21, 2010
    Florida
    0
    Ive had a FAF for a little over 4 years. Like stated previously no measurable mpg gain. It takes me less than 30 minutes to wash and then a couple hours to air dry,15 minutes to re-oil,assemble. Someone is doing it wrong ;) . I just wait till im home and outside working in the yard or the like.
     
  4. russtrucker

    russtrucker Road Train Member

    1,767
    337
    Mar 27, 2012
    Central PA
    0
    I would just use papar filter and not waste more than $300 for faf.
     
  5. Dale thompson

    Dale thompson Road Train Member

    5,107
    42,331
    Nov 20, 2013
    commerce twp,mi
    0
    doing it wrong MMMMMMMM mite just be my OCD but most of the time about 1-2 hours washing the foam I keep rewashing until rinse water is clean then may as well wait till next day for the element to be completely dry then at least 45 minutes to oil the element and repeated wringing of the element to distribute oil evenly and squeeze off excess then at least 10 minutes to reassemble being careful to tuck the edges in neatly an align the seams properly then after all that I'm really happy that I saved about 30 bucks
     
  6. v6killer

    v6killer Medium Load Member

    446
    122
    Dec 6, 2010
    ChicagoLand
    0
    The problem with most OEM air boxes they are just too small, not enough of dead air space to make any difference. The FAF dose trap more dirty air then a paper one.
     
  7. crzyjarmans

    crzyjarmans Road Train Member

    3,310
    2,427
    Jun 9, 2010
    Home
    0
    Sounds like another crap product like the turbo 3000
     
  8. Cowpie1

    Cowpie1 Road Train Member

    5,569
    4,651
    Nov 25, 2008
    Kellogg, IA
    0
    As for whether the FAF or stock filter traps more dirt, I think it is a wash. My silicon levels (dirt) in the oil samples I ran both with FAF and stock filters was pretty close to the same. The FAF, maybe 1 point higher, but that doesn't even really "move the meter" so to say. They both do a decent job of filtration. The key is really does the FAF provide any appreciable performance and mpg gains. Some maybe to some folks. I never saw it. All I ever experienced with the FAF was being able to hear the turbo spool up.

    As a side note, when running the FAF, I was getting some fuel dilution I could not account for in my oil samples. Once I got back on stock filters, that went away. The fuel dilution was not critical, but it did show up. What caused it by using the FAF, I have no clue. Maybe just one of the freak things of nature.
     
  9. double yellow

    double yellow Road Train Member

    5,946
    10,066
    Aug 28, 2011
    State of Jefferson
    0
    No noticeable difference in mpg. Washing it is as easy as spritzing dish washer soap & hosing it out -- no oil to apply & you don't have to wait for it to dry.
     
  10. russtrucker

    russtrucker Road Train Member

    1,767
    337
    Mar 27, 2012
    Central PA
    0
    If you're the guy to rush. Then I would prefer paper filter. With FAF filters, you can have that time at home.
     
  11. askbob

    askbob Light Load Member

    213
    112
    Aug 16, 2010
    Bluegrass
    0
    You'd be better off with a K&N or stick with a quality paper filter.
     
  • Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.