Good evening to you all on the forum. My father in law was tipped off by someone who works in the CHP BIT audit department that there's a high chance his company will get audited by the DOT. His company had a rough year a few years ago but since then has improved so Im wondering if this audit is just about collecting money?
A couple years ago one of his trucks had an accident. No one was seriously hurt. He said companies are rated with DOT scores and said his were not good but they have got better. The one that is still a problem is Hours of Service. That one got better but it has been floating around a "threshold" since the accidents. Also he has not only improved the scores but also reduced the amount of trucks. The company went from over 15 to now about 5 only. On top of that he hasn't received any violations for or major violations where they shut the truck down in half a year maybe longer.
Why would the DOT go after a company that is downsizing and not having more problems? From the idea I got of the scores, the HOS is still high from old violations. Shouldn't they have done an audit after the accident? The man loaned me some money to buy my home a while back so I try to help on things even if he doesn't ask for help. I'm just trying to figure out whats really going on. Thank you.
Is the DOT planning an audit just for $?
Discussion in 'Ask An Owner Operator' started by monroef68, Aug 16, 2017.
Page 1 of 2
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
Hos violations, last oos was 6 months ago, accident. Downsizing has nothing to do with anything. Everyone is subject to an audit at any time. Sounds like he is in need of one. Yeah he has been improving but the government train has small wheels. Lots of noise and smoke but it moves slow.
bzinger, Tb0n3 and Broke Down 69 Thank this. -
There is a score to carriers, the more crappy of a score, the more they get pulled in for inspection. Nothing new and nothing secret about it. It is all about the crappy carrier and I wish they would do more to put some of these crap carriers out of business.
-
Something that happened 8 months or so ago is just now coming up for review. Make sure that everything is documented in maintenance files. If it's not written down it didn't happen.
-
Something's raising a red flag in his file.
-
15 trucks down to 5 will make the violations look worse by percentage. It would be interesting to see the Measure #s on the CSA in the process of getting rid of the trucks.
For instance 5 violations for 5 trucks looks a lot worse than 5 violations spread across 15 trucks. -
I see what you are saying but wouldn't the system they use take into consideration that the violations happened when there were more trucks? Because if not every time someone reduced their fleet their scores would automatically look worse even if they weren't doing worse on the road.
-
Actually the accident happened over 2 years ago. Is it common for something old to come up like that way later? Maybe because there's so many other accidents to review?
-
Most likely they are just running that far behind. Maybe it's no longer like this but a half dozen years ago it would take atleast a year just to get your new entry inspection done.
-
Might just be a routine follow up after the rough patch he went thru. I wouldn't sweat it, as long as everything on the office side is in order he should be good to go.
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 1 of 2