You're part of the "some..." Mr. Dice.
Have you forgotten your own post on the subject? Something about pursuing 10 MPG in a truck weighing 75-80k you might recall.
And while you are searching your memory, how about you tell me what your MPG was on the two loads you posted about earlier in this thread? And how about you also tell me if in that load to Provost AB, what your MPG was and how far you bob tailed to the next one. In fact, could you provide your annual bobtail ratio for all of us to see? That would be helpful.
Thank you.
MPG in the Real World
Discussion in 'Ask An Owner Operator' started by Freightlinerbob, Apr 8, 2013.
Page 11 of 12
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
I have no problem with commenting that I get mid 7's and my "average" payload is in the 35,000 lb arena. I get anywhere from 10,000 lb loads to 46,500 lb loads. I consider that real world. Most folks, again.... MOST FOLKS, do not run around grossed out 24/7, 365 a year. There is deadhead, lighter loads, etc that go on in the "real world" mpg average. The only thing we all have in common to deal with is terrain, weather, traffic, etc. True, someone who runs heavy most of the time is going to probably get less mpg than someone who runs light all the time. But even though we are not all doing specialized/heavy/OD kind of stuff, doesn't mean the comments we put in are invalid and not "real world". It is disingenuous at best to make this apples to oranges comparison and play the "my junk is bigger than your junk" game.
-
I agree with you Cowpie. But when a guy posts huge MPG numbers and then states things like "I like my Volvo and CAT" as if to say that those are the reasons for the MPGs he's getting, it's disingenuous.
I strongly suspect that Dice's remarkable mpg has less to do with anything he's done and more to do with the nature of his work which is NOT a typical freight hauling operation. -
Someday everyone will be invited to the party.....http://www.truckinginfo.com/channel...uck-size-weight-limit-study.aspx?prestitial=1
And I'm not comparing anything ...........
Just saying with our current technology in the US you ain't going to get 10mpg with that weight .... -
-
-
Likely the most aerodynamic and van-like load this year so far. 76,000# and really trying for economy.
6.95 measured over 2600 loaded and 90 empty miles in very favorable conditions:Last edited: Jun 6, 2013
MNdriver Thanks this. -
75,000-80,000 all the time. Run the mountain west, average 6.3-6.8 with a Centery Class, 07, C-15 Accert.
-
8.5-9mpg at 58mph
6.9-7.3 at 65mph
Pretty darn close to 1gal/hour idle. Those are actual mpg not trip computer (which reads .3-.5mpg high)
2011 prostar+ 13L maxxforce EF10 tag axle XTA super singles full aero skirting 15" airgap to 53' super-singled dryvans (which have undertrays about half the time). 120psi in all 10 tires, 1425rpm @65mph, 1250@58. Loads vary from 15-48k (grossing 47-80k -- typically around 65k). 48 states + Canada, but definitely skewed toward central & eastern timezones. 50,000 mile sample size (220,000-270,000 on truck). Deadhead maybe 10-15%. Never bobtailed more than a parkinglot...Last edited: Jun 6, 2013
Freightlinerbob Thanks this. -
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 11 of 12