OK, I'm getting ready to buy a 2017 Cascadia Glider with a 12.7 reman engine. My FL dealer tells me that the Cascadia can be ordered with 80% of the stuff that makes a Cascadia Evolution so slippery. I run flatdeck, maybe changing to Rocky Mountain Doubles and missing a downshift going down the Rockies scares the cr@p out of me. I want a more aerodynamic truck. The only sucky thing about the Cascadia is the biggest available sleeper is only 72". I'd love a Volvo VNL780 but Volvo doesn't make glider kits.
I hate shifting, too but only in the cities where I get up to speed and then have to stop at a light again.
The 2017 glider can be ordered with all of the new electronic stuff like lane depature warning, adaptive cruise, lightweight options, super singles, disk brakes, AirLiner suspension and even the Meritor 14X tandems. Pretty much all the new stuff you can get on a new truck expect DEF and 400 lbs of emission cr@p.
It can also be ordered with either an Allison 4000 narrow ratio or 4500 wide ratio fully automatic 6 speed. I'd love a TC10 and hated the autoshift in my KW T660 Coke truck so I'd only consider a 13 speed or Allison. The TC10 isn't able to communicate properly with the old DDEC computer so no TC10 option or any autoshift for that matter.
I'd like to get some opinions from drivers that have actually driven a Class 8 OTR truck with an Allison 6 speed. 2 dealers have told me how they drink fuel but with a lockup converter and the trans itself using planetary gears to transmit the power I don't see how the fuel mileage on the highway will be that different from a 10 speed other than maybe the double overdrive will reduce the engine torque on the highway forcing the transmission to downshift to 5th gear too much.
Here is a guy running a 2011 Cascadia with a DD15 and he loves how smooth it shifts. See here:
But this guy is running an DD15 engine, 72 mph and getting 5.2 MPG. He doesn't say what his rear axle ratio is but 3:05 in the video, his engine is turning at 1300 RPM and he's doing 55 so I'm guessing his diffs must be around 4.50 using the .64 o/d 6th gear.
This is all I could find. I'm looking for real world experiences with a Series 60 12.7 and 3.73 rears.
Thanks for your comments.
RB
Opinions on a Cascadia Glider with 12.7 and ALLISON 6 speed fully automatic?
Discussion in 'Trucks [ Eighteen Wheelers ]' started by rbrauns, Oct 28, 2016.
Page 1 of 2
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
12.7 with a auto would = turd
Toomanybikes, snowman_w900 and 207nomad Thank this. -
I looked at this when they first came out, heard they were having problems with the wiring because the Cascadia was never built to take the older engine & the wiring had to be custom made.
-
I've ran with Allison's in CNG local trucks and some Bobtail tankers, it's a complete dog imo. I wouldn't ever want to run mountains or even above 60k with a 6 speed, I feel they are designed for inner city only.
snowman_w900 Thanks this. -
-
-
First off, to anyone complaining about the Allison, if it's a turd, it is because the engine has been neutered. I can tell you first hand, in a bus weighing 36k empty, 4.56 rears, 12.7 non waste-gate Series 60 and an Allison B500, which is similar to the 4000/4500 series, it pulls like a champ.
The CNG trucks people are describing above come with basically a 9 liter CNG Cummins engine, hardly a comparison. Also, the new trucks they gear them to run at a super low RPM. They just recently came out with a 12 liter Cummins CNG.
How does my 430 HP pull? Stunning. In 6th gear at 70 MPH, I can climb any hill that a truck and trailer weighing 34k pounds empty would lose speed on. Fuel mileage? 8-9.8 MPG non stop free way driving, in a flat nose bus.
If you watch the video that someone posted with the automatic Cascadia, they reported 6.4-6.8 MPG, then later reported at 72 MPH, they were averaging 5.9 MPG. Keep in mind, higher speeds means lesser fuel mileage, pending the engine's sweet spot. Also, with these Emissions engines, the more miles, the more soot and crap that builds up on sensors, it tends to degrade fuel economy.
If you have the horse power, you don't need all the gears. Here is a video of a 2007 KW T-800 with a C15 Cat and Allison 4500 RDS 6 speed automatic:
I wouldn't hesitate to get the Allison, just make sure you have the horse power to go with it.
You do not want a 3.73 axle ratio, trust me. The Series 60 likes a higher RPM, it's the newer engines that do better in low RPM's.Last edited: Nov 6, 2016
-
I should hope 430hp can shove 34k up a hill. Try that with another 46k, though, and it'll be laying down on the shoulder crying.
Allisons have their place, they are great in vocational trucks- Dump trucks, short haul, garbage trucks, etc. Not OTR. -
Well, it's not just the transmission, it's the engine. That same set up with an ISM Cummins, would fall on it's face. A DD13 with "eco torque" settings on, would fall on it's face.
It goes back to, if you have the HP, you don't need all the gears. With a 10 speed, if you have 550-600 HP, you can pull hills in 10th gear with 80k. Allison is no different. There's just way too many variables.
There is a place OTR. What difference does it make if you drive regional around SLC, UT or OTR on a daily basis? The transmission doesn't know any different. Besides, all the big fleet trucks I've driven lately, they all fall on their face because the engines are turned down to save fuel. -
There was another fellow on here last year that got a new Cascadia with a DD16 pulling over 105,000 dumps and an Allison automatic. He was quite happy with its performance.
I looked at a glider manufacturer in St Catherine's, they had the proper hookups for the computers and could run any engine you wanted in them. But at $176,000 I just went with a brand new one, although I got the Ultrashift Eaton.
RR Plett in Vancouver has a bunch on Cascadias with Allisons pulling tri-axles through the BC mountains. They loved them.
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 1 of 2