Well, this shows my ignorance on this. I drive an 2008 Pete, the one in my sig. I was thinking it was a 387, but this last week I had a newer Pete park beside me, and noticed that mine was skinnier. I know that BBC measurements are different, but haven't measured mine yet. When I go back on Tuesday, if I remember, I'll grab a measurement of it.
So is the 387 fatter/wider than the 386? I tried finding something in the owner's manual in my truck that would clarify this, but all I could find was the year and it's a Pete (duh). The VIN plate did not give any clue. I know that hidden in the VIN would be this info, however I don't know what digits would be the tell-tale model. Just curious so I know which it is..
![]()
Pete 386 or 387
Discussion in 'Questions From New Drivers' started by Eaton18, Dec 23, 2011.
Page 1 of 2
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
You drive a 386. The wider aero pete is the 387/587.
Eaton18 Thanks this. -
Ok, thanks. That's what I thought, after seeing the one parked beside me. Until then, never had mine around anything other than 379s. I didn't think mine was that skinny until that day.
-
No problem. Your truck has the same cab and sleeper as the long nose petes.
-
Hey Eaton18 how do you like the 386? I'm looking at a 07 with the isx 450hp cummins and a ultrashift in it. What kind of mpg's are ya getting?
-
I drive a long nose Pete but I really like those 386s- especially in silver grey with a mid roof sleeper. Nice looking piece of equipment.
Eaton18 Thanks this. -
In my opinion the long nose tractors are nice looking and it what I grew up riding with Dad during the summer but those trucks were from a much simpler time. Now with fuel prices, EPA nazi's around every corner then those from the left coast before long we are going to be saddled with video cameras in the cabs to monitor your fatigue and how many times your eyes close or blink a day. It is getting just pretty crazy
-
So overall I would say that getting much more than 5.5mpg is wishful thinking. The computer says I'm getting an average of 4.3 mpg. The Cummin's engine may do a little better on fuel. I also run with Jakes on when I can. It is equipped with the 3-level. I use the low jakes when I coming into towns that prohibit them. I'll run the jake right up to their ridiculous "Engine Braking not allowed" sign..
One thing I don't like about it, is the narrow walk way from the cab to sleeper. I'm by no means a wide-glide, (down to 187 lbs now) but almost have to turn sideways to get through.
We also have the Engine Idle shutdown. This is more of a PITA while actually working. What I mean is, since we run end-dumps, the truck needs to idle while raising and lowering the bed. The bed has an air vibrator to help shake loose the material. Never fails, when I jump out of the cab, go back and bang the tailgate to also help, the darn thing will shut down. So I have to run back up, re-start the engine, then go back and finish what I was doing.
Since we have the no-idle, they do have the bunk heater/ac. I can tell you the heater will run you out. I woke up one morning sweating my butt off. It was about 25 degs outside. The heater said it was 90 degs in the bunk. For some reason the temp just kept climbing. It also will have a problem with shutting down. I have also woke up freezing. When it shuts down, you need to manually restart it. This happens if something in the storage compartment shifts while driving and blocks the intake vent for the heater. So I have to make sure there's nothing in the way each night before firing it up.
Overall I think it's a pretty good rig..Last edited: Dec 25, 2011
-
Wow wasn't expecting that bad of mpg's, Thanks for the feedback though.
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 1 of 2