Peterbuilt 386 vs Prostar

Discussion in 'Trucks [ Eighteen Wheelers ]' started by Md420, May 10, 2016.

  1. Md420

    Md420 Medium Load Member

    469
    559
    Nov 2, 2015
    Tn
    0
    Like to stay away from opinions on the way they look and fit/finish.

    If you were to pick between say a 2011/2012 386 and prostar both with a isx both around the same milage bothe strait 10's which would you do?
     
  2. Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.

  3. Sportster2000

    Sportster2000 Road Train Member

    1,480
    886
    Jan 5, 2008
    Indiana
    0
    Peterbilt because I truly think that you can get better fuel mileage out of them and they weigh less than the Prostar.
     
    Md420 Thanks this.
  4. dngrous_dime

    dngrous_dime Road Train Member

    3,150
    5,765
    Jan 28, 2014
    Lansing area, MI
    0
    Depends if you want resale value in 3-4 years, or if you just plan to run it till it's dead. Personally, I prefer Internationals, but I know the Pete will hold value better.
     
    Md420 Thanks this.
  5. Md420

    Md420 Medium Load Member

    469
    559
    Nov 2, 2015
    Tn
    0
    I honestly like a prostar/isx combo. I've had good luck with them, 6.5+mpg and I am familiar with them. I detest kw 660's looks but like the 386 and I know the 660 is probably the most aerodynamic truck on the road and figured the 386 got some of those traits from it's cousin.
     
  6. crb

    crb Road Train Member

    1,676
    1,374
    Dec 1, 2009
    USA
    0
    Company or o/o?

    Price difference if buying?
     
  7. Md420

    Md420 Medium Load Member

    469
    559
    Nov 2, 2015
    Tn
    0
    Would be o/o. Price is nearly the same.
     
  8. Md420

    Md420 Medium Load Member

    469
    559
    Nov 2, 2015
    Tn
    0
    Here
    Prostar is a 2012 with 325k miles on it, 450hp isx, eaton fuller 10 speed. $39,000

    Pete is an 11 with 370k miles on it, 450hp isx eaton 10 speed $44,000

    Have seen a clean rig dig on both, both have regular updates on ecu history. Prostar had a new turbo at 275k
     
  9. solitary_con

    solitary_con Light Load Member

    147
    137
    Mar 2, 2007
    Cook County, IL
    0
    Between the two, the Pete was a better ride. Far as fuel mileage they both did around 6.9 mpg pulling an average of 48k. A lot of cruising and minimal hills.
     
  10. Sipesh

    Sipesh Medium Load Member

    617
    1,101
    Apr 3, 2014
    Colorado
    0
    If you like to work on the truck yourself, that 386 having the longer hood makes working on that Cummins engine a HECK of a lot easier. The back of the engine is accessible. Prostar has it crammed up under the cab pretty far.
     
  11. dngrous_dime

    dngrous_dime Road Train Member

    3,150
    5,765
    Jan 28, 2014
    Lansing area, MI
    0
    Apu? Bunk heater? Similar bunks? If all else is equal, I'd go with the Pete.
     
  • Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.