I would agree that "unhooking" the EGR, as in unplugging it, would do what you suggest. That is because you are causing the ECM to have a brain cramp over what you did. However, by blocking the EGR gasses from entering the intake, and leaving everything else hooked up, does not do this. Unlike Detroits, the ISX (at least pre 07) does not have a EGR gas flow sensor. If the EGR gasses are not flowing into the intake, yet all connections are hooked up, then no harm, no foul.
Either way, I have had a block at the intake preventing EGR gasses from going in for roughly 300,000 miles. I currently have almost 700,000 on the engine. The engine really cleaned up after I blocked off things. Now my oil stays almost from the jug clean up till around 10,000 miles. My oil samples at 25,000 OCI's look like a much younger engine. And with a year round average above 7mpg (just below 7 mpg average in winter, well above 7 mpg in summer) compared to the previous year round average of roughly 6.5, it was a no brainer. I haven't had the engine on a dyno, but I am competing quite favorably with others pulling the hills.
But now there is a better solution anyway.... a guy who used to work for Holset (you know... the turbo chargers) is now reprogramming ECM's to eliminate the EGR and DPF functions. Basically turns the ECM into a pre-egr ECM. And he cranks up the hp and torque. A complete reprogram, not a "add-on" box or some other goofy device. Do a web search for JBall Electronics.
Questions to ISX owners
Discussion in 'Trucks [ Eighteen Wheelers ]' started by mhyn, Feb 2, 2009.
Page 6 of 7
-
Last edited: Apr 15, 2011
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
BTW I lived in Saskatoon for 3 years. I sure do not miss the winters. The Greek restaurants were good though! -
-
I have a 2003 pre-egr ISX 475 ST in a 9400i with air tabs, FASS system, High Flow muffler and air filter, on Xone XDA Energy single tires. I've seen 9 mpg and for the last 8,712 miles have averaged 8.268 mpg. I don't use the truck computer, I check my mileage at every fill up. I run at 1300 rpm, which for me is 57 mph, and average about 70,000 lbs gross. Less than 100 miles per week are run mt. I didn't believe 9mpg when I first got it, I redid the numbers three times to verify, checked my tire revolutions per mile and had my speedometer checked. Everything checked out, I did get 9 mpg. My new goal is 10 mpg. -
-
-
-
Anyway, Cummins didn't recommend low rpm Cruising for the N14 either. I have over 1.6 million on mine. Been driving it close to 1300 rpm for years. My point being that this isn't a "firm" recommendation to follow. I think it's more of a safe suggestion based on the "lowest common denominator"...essentially meaning some people don't exercise the best smarts in their maintenance practices and engine operation.Last edited: Nov 26, 2011
-
But I agree with you, there is so many variables and ways to screw up motors - its hard to come up with general conclusions, not to mention there will always be someone succesfully doing oposite - like the guy with Volvo D16 625hp I talked to - he put 670k miles on it and still loved it when this thing is total failure and off the market for long time already -
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 6 of 7