Small Fuel Tanks

Discussion in 'Experienced Truckers' Advice' started by Bumpy, Mar 29, 2011.

  1. Bumpy

    Bumpy Road Train Member

    6,533
    5,261
    Jan 27, 2009
    New Ulm,MN
    0
    O.K.,Its time I asked this question. I am wondering WHY OTR companies would use small fuel tanks on their trucks,? I,myself,find this terribly annoying,and do not understand this,especially a flatbed company,where most trailers are spread axle and have more of a cushion with regards to weight distribution on the trailer,-do not have to worry so much about the drives?:biggrin_2556:
     
  2. Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.

  3. Les2

    Les2 Road Train Member

    5,150
    2,288
    Jul 25, 2008
    kicked back in my lazyboy...
    0
    Its for total weight not just how much is on the steer or drives.
     
  4. Bumpy

    Bumpy Road Train Member

    6,533
    5,261
    Jan 27, 2009
    New Ulm,MN
    0
    OK then,I just think it would be a lot more convenient to pick up a load on half tanks,and knowing for sure the load was light,fill up the 150gl tanks,and NOT have to worry about fueling for awhile.?:biggrin_2556: vs.,havin fuel tanks with a 500 mi range,and sometimes then having the HORROR of having to get fuel twice a day?:biggrin_25521:
     
  5. FLATBED

    FLATBED Road Train Member

    Spring time LOAD RESTRICTIONS limit some trucks off certain roads , small tanks are a benefit this time of year.
     
  6. canuck in da truck

    canuck in da truck Road Train Member

    4,352
    2,601
    Aug 6, 2010
    western pa
    0
    i would rather have the option of having big tanks and running them 1/2 full or less if i had to--guess it would also depend on where the tanks are mounted--i kinda prefer forward mouted tanks--then i have no problem maxing out my steering if i want with fuel not having to mess with 5th wheel--only trailer tandems
     
  7. ‘Olhand

    ‘Olhand Cantankerous Crusty

    6,750
    16,653
    Jan 18, 2011
    0
    I have to agree--without knowing the specifics--IMHO--an m/t 100 gallon tank--is not significantly lighter than an m/t 150 gallon tank--so in weight situations you just take on LESS fuel with larger tank--but at least have the option when weight isn't an issue--100 more gallons--takes you a whole lot farther--and in today's brave new world--with cvsa2010--and limited work times--who wants to fuel anymore than they have to?
    Just my $.02
     
  8. ironpony

    ironpony Road Train Member

    17,502
    12,015
    Sep 23, 2007
    Ask my GPS...
    0
    My carrier (on the reefer side) did it purely for gross weight savings.
     
  9. Les2

    Les2 Road Train Member

    5,150
    2,288
    Jul 25, 2008
    kicked back in my lazyboy...
    0
    The problem is, how many drivers think about putting on less fuel? Not many want to put up with that headache. With fuel weighing around 8lbs per gallon if memory servs me correct, 100 gallons would be 800lbs. Big difference.
     
  10. outerspacehillbilly

    outerspacehillbilly "Instigator of the Legend"

    4,349
    2,430
    May 28, 2009
    The Who's Your State
    0
    Or how many are/aren't smart enough to figure out how much to put on?
     
    Hammer166, lilillill and Raiderfanatic Thank this.
  11. ‘Olhand

    ‘Olhand Cantankerous Crusty

    6,750
    16,653
    Jan 18, 2011
    0
    I guess you are being serous--so I guess I will be too--knowing how much fuel you can put on is part of the job--same as anything else--and more often than not if I had 100 gallon tanks--I couldn't fill them--so there ya have it!
    just my $.02
     
  • Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.