I see. The reason I brought up the state’s Long Arm is that in a non-trucking world you can’t just drag a guy say from CA to your local court say in OH without qualifying him under your state’s Long Arm terms. Which usually means you must show the CA guy has ‘sufficient minimum contacts’ with OH for the Ohio court to invoke jurisdiction over him. And I’m talking about state courts, not federal. To try in a federal one, you need to have the amount in dispute to be over $75k, if I remember correctly.
But about freight brokers… Hmm., let me get this one straight. Their authority is interstate. Does this mean that you, say a local carrier in OH, could just head to your municipal small claims and file your complaint there against that broker from CA? Then you just serve his ‘designated agent’ in Ohio? And the broker will be forced to come from CA to your local small claims court in OH to defend against your suit? Did I get this right?
Suing an out-of-state broker in your state under the Long Arm
Discussion in 'Trucking Industry Regulations' started by gseweb, Dec 25, 2019.
Page 3 of 3
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
The offience happened in your city/county -
-
-
What’s the advantage for a little guy to go against the broker in a federal court? Too formal, too expensive, too intimidating. Too much marble on the walls. LOL. I’d rather use our Common Pleas..
-
-
The judge would decide which jurisdiction would better serve both parties. That is if the jurisdiction hasn't been agreed to in a contract.
The contract would supercede the court action.
If you sue a broker in your local court and the broker doesn't file a motion to change venue, it will stay in your local court.
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 3 of 3