What is the REAL maximum HP/Torque that can be put to a RTLO16913A ?

Discussion in 'Trucks [ Eighteen Wheelers ]' started by Guntoter, Mar 12, 2018.

  1. swaan

    swaan Road Train Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2009
    Messages:
    2,942
    Thanks Received:
    4,374
    Location:
    BC canada
    0
    There's more to it then just torque divided by gear ratio..... tire size is in that equation too...

    But I forget what the equation was to get the proper number.

    If your at 725 HP your probley up around 2250 torque.. just a close estimate.
     
    SAR Thanks this.
  2. SmokinCAT

    SmokinCAT Road Train Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2010
    Messages:
    1,773
    Thanks Received:
    1,487
    Location:
    Hillsboro, OH./ Adrian, MI
    0
    What RPM was that taken at?

    Was that at the RPM where it made 725hp?
     
    SAR Thanks this.
  3. SmokinCAT

    SmokinCAT Road Train Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2010
    Messages:
    1,773
    Thanks Received:
    1,487
    Location:
    Hillsboro, OH./ Adrian, MI
    0
    Not to most dyno operators that I have talked too, if that were the case then it would be factored into the drive line loss for HP as well.

    That truck could have very well only been showing that if he gave him the number that was showing when it was at max RPM making peak HP.
     
    SAR Thanks this.
  4. Superhauler

    Superhauler TEACHER OF MEN

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2010
    Messages:
    12,209
    Thanks Received:
    100,731
    Location:
    keep stroking.
    0
    I'm north of 725 and I'm not pushing no 2800 ft lbs.
     
  5. SAR

    SAR Road Train Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,756
    Thanks Received:
    36,654
    Location:
    ND
    0
    Wait....what?! I thought monster was pushing over 1000?
     
    Oxbow Thanks this.
  6. Superhauler

    Superhauler TEACHER OF MEN

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2010
    Messages:
    12,209
    Thanks Received:
    100,731
    Location:
    keep stroking.
    0
    No..no..no ! Little south of that.LOL
     
    Oxbow, stwik and SAR Thank this.
  7. benjamin260_6

    benjamin260_6 Medium Load Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2012
    Messages:
    433
    Thanks Received:
    484
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    0
    If it put down 5500# and it was in top gear, it would have done something more like 7530 in direct where you're supposed to dyno a truck. Divide that by 3.36 and you get 2241...pretty close to what Swan estimated
     
    Cat sdp Thanks this.
  8. SmokinCAT

    SmokinCAT Road Train Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2010
    Messages:
    1,773
    Thanks Received:
    1,487
    Location:
    Hillsboro, OH./ Adrian, MI
    0
    Then it was not ran correctly, trucks should always be ran in direct.
     
    Tb0n3 and SAR Thank this.
  9. benjamin260_6

    benjamin260_6 Medium Load Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2012
    Messages:
    433
    Thanks Received:
    484
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    0
    No argument here but theres lots of things that should be done correctly that aren't. I was just trying to take his number and come up with a realistic torque number. Who knows what the real number is though
     
    swaan Thanks this.
  10. snowman_w900

    snowman_w900 Road Train Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2010
    Messages:
    4,418
    Thanks Received:
    81,025
    0
    What kind of paint did you use on the engine? Did you paint it yourself?
     
    Oxbow and SAR Thank this.