Also to add, there are some states that already allow a milk tanker to be 88,000 however on an interstate highway your gross weight and your Bridge must abide by the federal laws which do not exempt milk trucks only state and County highways
Why would milk tank trucker's want a short (28') inner bridge length?
Discussion in 'Tanker, Bulk and Dump Trucking Forum' started by Mike Murphy, Apr 21, 2015.
Page 2 of 2
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
-
Hopefully this doesn't pass. We will just have to haul heavier weights for the same lousy pay.
Grouch Thanks this. -
Most of my milk loads netted about 30K to 38K from the cows by noon when I was finished my route and on way to dairy. I guess the tanker trailer was 7500 tare tractor another 14000 maybe. call it between 70 80K.
We could take on some more but that depends on how well the cows are doing. Literally. If they are emotionally happy, fed, content and so forth they will produce alot of milk. If they are hungry, dirty or whatever that milk is going to get rejected and dumped into a field rather than allowed to contaiminate the entire trailer.
Milk farmers are paid by weight. Assuming a 10,000 pound tank in a milk room, weight by measure and its backed by the State because you hold a license to do so issued by state. No one touches or loads or transports raw milk without that particular license. Because the income of the farmer depends on the number YOU write onto the clipboard by the door. If you are good and everything is in order, it's going to be pretty close to a plain written number from the previous milking.
Never a scale in my time. We cared more about getting on and off the farm more than weights. One farm in particular, had a pivoting area for trailer tandem above a 400 foot ravine. If she slipped more than 5 feet this way or that over you go. Straight down.
Short tanks are good. But not always that good on the highway, that is where you and your skills come into play. Concentrated weight etc.
I don't care if it is a 300,000 pound tanker trailer it's going to be collected provided there are farms big enough to ship that much. (And there are a couple who can load a tank in one go.... those are given to senior drivers, there is simply too much money involved in the weighing...)
At the same time, I do care. There are bridges that wont take a 10 ton vehicle, however is placarded for the local FD (Fire dept) which says it will take a 20K single or a 34K on tandem. So over I go. -
The older trailers were shorter, and in Iowa, loading had to be reduced on these because of bridge laws, this was fuel tankers, too, as far as I remember. I once worked intake at a dairy plant and grade A for bottling was shipped out. Weight was at 73280 on a 5 axle combination in the mid 70s.
We used some old fuel tankers at a job to haul aqueous liquids. -
Mr. Murphy,
The 28' bridge might come in handy for operators wishing to run a straight truck / pup trailer combination, or perhaps a tractor with 2 pup trailers, but I can't imagine that it would help traditional tractor-trailer fleet, unless they begin purchasing trailers that are shorter in length and bigger in diameter. -
Besides the ability to turn, tankers use the barrel as the stressed frame between the sub-frame for the suspension and the sub frame for the 5th wheel plate which is why you don't see at 53' tankers.
Too long = cracks in the barrel, especially with the added stress of spinning around in the farm yard. -
Attached Files:
-
-
The smaller diameter and gauge of the Stainless works for your application plus the rear sub frame is huge.
-
7,000 gallons and built to haul 16 pound a gallon product and be pressurized. Dang things weigh 20,500 pounds empty.
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 2 of 2