It is obvious you don’t know much about the early history of cb.
A lot of things were legal until I think around 1963 when they addressed issues that they thought were important.
code squelch as it was called by a few was never illegal, it would be useless with the amount of people on the bands still there.
Will NFM Save CB???
Discussion in 'CB Radio Forum' started by russbrill, Feb 3, 2022.
Page 2 of 3
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
I never said CTCSS was illegal. It is just not as compatible with Amplitude Modulation as FM. Yes, there was a lot of tweaking with channels and different things in the late 50's and early 60's but I think your assertion that I know little of the early history is unfounded. The FCC dropped several important balls, early on.
To make matters worse, the ARRL and greedy hams helped kill a great concept in personal communications in the early 1970's. There was a proposal to carve out a chunk of the mostly unused 220 MHz ham band and create a Class E CB. The proposed Class E would have fixed the problems the FCC overlooked with Class D.
Among other things, Class E CB would have:
1) provided somewhere between 40 and 80 Narrowband FM channels (early 70's protocol). I forget the exact number, but it was considerably more than the 23 channels then available on Class D. There is almost zero detailed info on the net today, though numerous articles were published about this proposal in the early 70's.
2) Allowed up to 25 Watts output.
3) Been on VHF, allowing for very efficient, much shorter physically, antennas on mobiles and portables. Unlike 27 MHz, which will barely xmit or receive a few feet from inside an automobile without an outside antenna, 220 would have allowed for very decent transmission and reception from inside of vehicles and buildings without outside antennas. Additionally, cross country and international skip would have been eliminated.
The hams and ARRL whined bloody murder about the idea of taking frequencies from hams and giving it to "undisciplined CB'ers". That band saw little use back then because gear capable of operating it was scarce and very expensive. The hams won and traffic on 220 remained scarce. Some time, I believe in the 80's or 90's, the FCC auctioned off chunks of 220 to business interests, mostly UPS, I believe. The hams still lost a piece of their little used band. Today, there is probably more affordable 220 capable ham gear than ever, but it is still under-utilized in most parts of the country. Even at that, the gear is not "that" plentiful. As the CB hatred by hams has gradually waned over the decades, many would likely have found Class E useful for keeping in contact with non-ham family and friends, much as they do today with FRS/GMRS.shooter19802003 and Timin770 Thank this. -
Blaskowitz Thanks this.
-
It's SIMPLE when you attach a Dollar Bill to itBlaskowitz and shooter19802003 Thank this. -
shooter19802003 Thanks this.
-
Last edited: Feb 8, 2022
Blaskowitz, rabbiporkchop and shooter19802003 Thank this. -
-
I know a number of younger hams in my area. The local ham club I'm a member of is administering new license exams to about 5-10 people a week. I admit it is hard to get today's kids interested in it when they have the Internet, but I've had some success at it as a Radio merit badge counselor for our scout troop.Blaskowitz, shooter19802003 and Timin770 Thank this. -
In the GMRS repeater group I am a member of, out of hundreds of members it looks like about 45% also hold a ham ticket. If you feel like doing the math get your calculator and go to www.nggmrs.com
Blaskowitz and shooter19802003 Thank this. -
On a side not, I really want to get more into cw and qrp radios. I just think it would be fun.Blaskowitz Thanks this.
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 2 of 3