I use a local guy for windshields, $200 for the one piece glass in my KW, $100 a side for the 2 piece glass in a Freightliner. I think the '99 Century will be a bit more because it's a one piece that's glued in, making it a two man job. That according to the glass guy when he was out installing my last one (KW has a rubber seal) just after I bought the '99. Just haven't had the chance to buy one yet and see how much.
Double Yellow's Company Driver to Independent Thread
Discussion in 'Ask An Owner Operator' started by double yellow, Nov 5, 2014.
Page 115 of 198
-
csmith1281, Rocks, spectacle13 and 3 others Thank this.
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
Bobtailed into a mall to do some shopping, there was the mobile windshield repair guy there. $25 bucks to fix to small spider cracks. I can still see them only because I know where to look.
csmith1281, Grijon, tsavory and 1 other person Thank this. -
Well as a new member here I can say that this has been the best thread I have ever read on any forum that I have been on for any subject. Thanks DY and the rest of ya'll for all of the great information. I have been driving for sixteen years and have started kicking the idea of being an O/O around and this has opened my eyes to a lot of things that I have never even thought about. It took me two weeks to get through this thread reading whenever I had a minute to spare and I am going to miss it now that I have read it all. Thanks again
csmith1281, spectacle13, Rocks and 5 others Thank this. -
Does anyone else have some oil samples using Mobil Delvac 1 LE 5W30? I'm mildly concerned about how high my oxidation is after such a short sample and the only other UOA I've found using this oil showed a rapid rise in Acid number ( http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=2642510 )...
These are the 2 samples I have, both just under 10,000 miles on the oil:
Odometer 1565393 1581250
Inframe Age 16643 32500
Oil Age 9882 9750
Make-up Oil 0 0
Iron (<150ppm) 14 12
Chromium 0 0
Nickel 0 0
Aluminum 2 0
Copper (<30ppm) 0 0
Lead (<30ppm) 0 0
Tin 1 1
Cadmium 0 0
Silver 0 1
Vanadium 0 0
Silicon 3 3
Sodium 5 7
Potassium 12 12
Titanium 0 0
Molybdenum 4 0
Antimony 0 0
Manganese 0 0
Lithium 0 0
Boron 9 3
Magnesium 144 87
Calcium 2283 2365
Barium 0 0
Phosphorous 743 669
Zinc 843 767
Fuel (<2.5) <1 <1
Soot (<3) 0.3 0.2
Water (<0.3) <0.1 <0.1
Viscosity (10-16.5) 11.9 12.0
Base (>2) 7.64 7.55
Oxidation 18 20
Nitration 8 9
Stupid new forum won't do tables or columns...
Engine is a pre-emission Detroit 12.7 series 60csmith1281 and Grijon Thank this. -
According to an internet expert I found, the cause of higher oxidation numbers: High temperature, water oil aeration, metal catalysts (for example, wear debris).
That said, it's possible the small change in the oxidation number could just as well represent a new norm. Especially given the jump to a fresh inframe and new oil at once. Two samples isn't really enough to define a trend, either. No sign of a wear metal upswing, so I'd be inclined to run it as-is to the next sample and monitor oil temp (if possible). Probably not totally relevant given the equipment differences, but mine usually runs about 10-15º higher than the coolant temp. Maybe up to 20º on a hard climb. Maybe alter driving habits to reduce oil temp, but I think you're already firmly doing that.
Then again, what do I know? I'm doing 15k oil changes with regular Delvac and not sampling.csmith1281, Grijon and Blu_Ogre Thank this. -
csmith1281 Thanks this.
-
I am self insured; I have the resources to replace my truck and trailer should the need arise and have made a determination that it is best to tie up those resources in a low-risk, low-yield, highly-liquid investment rather than redeploying those funds elsewhere and concurrently purchasing physical damage insurance.
It also means that I try to mitigate my risks by doing things like parking in the safest spots -- places where any idiot can straight-line back in beside me... Unfortunately, there are some big ####ing idiots out here:
Last edited: Oct 17, 2015
csmith1281, icsheeple, mickcuster and 6 others Thank this. -
Self insured usually means you have the million dollar liability in cash. I think what your saying is you don't have collision, fire or theft coverage. If someone does hit you and it's not your fault the other insurance covers your damage anyways.
csmith1281 and Rocks Thank this. -
This is a fascinating thread DY, Thank you so much for sharing, as fellow Californian(San Diego) im focused in on the pre emissions portion of this conversation, with the one truck exemption shot down have you made any plans to upgrade your rig?Some of my colleagues are continuing to run their trucks until they wont let them run anymore. And that seems to be not anytime in near future, You know,...Back in the day a guy could buy an old truck learn how to work on it and work his way into newer equipment and build his business and teach his kids the the industry and help them buy their own truck Now with all bureaucracy its almost like they dont want small business to start here in California let alone thrive here. ITS CRAZY I was speaking with an old freind earlier in the week who has several 10 wheelers and some 3 axle day cabs, and he explained to me that CARB is so screwed up that as long you pay your tags have a valid CA# and MCP# they will leave you alone.And BTW
The only time ive ever seen CARB was at the rainbow scales in Fallbrook 3-4X on the SB side. in 6 years thats it, Never when working inside the county or in the city on the 5 or 15 on the 8 never.
Ive been looking at 2007 pre emission 379's with anticipation of installing an aftermarket DPF but holding out as long as I can before having to install it or putting a 2010 motor or buying a compliant truck.(at least there are options LOL) Ive seen the nightmare of 2008 1st gen regen systems 1st hand (2008 Volvo 3 axle day with the Volvo motor, 2 line wet kit and 10 speed running live floors) that truck spent more time in the shop for regen issues clogged DPF stack filter, flex pipe burnt holes, computer derate, Bad injectors, bad coppers, the list goes on and on ..... but I digress, If I thought I could get away with it I would shop for 2002-2007 379 Pete and preserve my working capitol for obvious reasons, but im scared to death that one day a year later I will get that letter saying SORRY you cant work your truck any more...then what?? I am screwed. Some of my freinds are saying aw F-it im going for it and they are snapping up the beaters and running them, and IM REALLY tempted to do the same, well kinda newer is better for my old ### LOL But im just not that eager to throw 20K of my hard earned money out like that. Like one of there posters said earlier: theres a difference when a guy a who doesn't have a family no house no responsibility doesn't have as much to lose as a guy who has a house and wife kids and monthly commitments, so Im a bit more cautious.
But anyway, back to my original question: Any plans on buying a newer truck?
Again, Thank You so much for sharing, Best of luck and hopefully one these we will meet up at Frazier Park and lunch is on me.
Kevincsmith1281 and Rocks Thank this. -
CARB has given me more stress and aggravation than anyone else. The CA taxpayers approved a $20,000,000,000 bond to help industries meet new CARB requirements, but the formula CARB came up with wound up giving most of the trucking money to out of state mega-fleets who were replacing their equipment every 3-5 years anyway. You and I paid for that...
New start-ups weren't eligible for funding because bureaucrats assume new businesses already go out and buy new equipment -- you had to own the truck for 3 years...
Ironically, if I keep my non-compliant truck registered for 3 years, I then become eligible for 1B funding!
It's just a mess.
I would like to be "part of the solution" -- I truly would. I hate seeing soot slowly build up on my new trailer -- that never happened as a company driver pulling DPF-equipped trucks. There were even a few months when I was making very good money that I thought "OK maybe now I can do this" and I started specing & pricing a new truck -- but rates this summer took a dive and I'm no longer in that position.
You have to remember not only does the truck cost more up front (both outright and especially if financed), but you pay more for insurance and have less predictable downtime.
I know of only a couple small businesses successfully using new trucks -- and none of them are really building equity; instead they get a new truck every 2-3 years. And they certainly don't take off 30-60 days at a time (which I like to).
And I don't know, maybe I never noticed the sentiment being as widespread before, or maybe I'm just getting burned out. But I read something like this drivel: http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/08/22/opinion/the-trucks-are-killing-us.html?referer= and I think why on earth should I put up with more regulatory BS?
As it stands, I'm not sure I'll stick around when the elog mandate takes effect. It's not the cause, it is just the final straw. Besides, this is an industry heading to automation and I don't have any desire to get involved in a protracted technological competition with deep-pocketed carriers.
I'm doing what I do because I love driving and I provide a service far superior to that provided by the average fleet & driver. Take away my edge and why play the game?
So my plans are to keep my truck and keep it in excellent mechanical condition (to that end, I just spent $4,000 rebuilding the suspension). I'll never recoup what I put into it, but I can also quit at any time without having a $150,000 liability weighing me down...
I rarely drive in California anymore -- I'm actually planning on flying back for Thanksgiving, so I don't worry about getting a CARB ticket.
As for you, if you want to drive in California day in & day out, I think you ought to plan on being compliant. My hunch, and it is little more than that, is that a pre-emission (pre-egr) engine with a retrofit DPF would probably be the most economical option. That only gets you to 2023, but the emission regulation rounds that follow will likely be more radical than what we're seeing now so there is no guarantee that a new 2017 tractor will remain legal in 2024 (just like how 2007 tractors became illegal in 2014): http://www.latimes.com/science/la-me-adv-ozone-transportation-20151011-story.htmlcsmith1281, icsheeple, Grijon and 6 others Thank this.
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 115 of 198