W900 that's way too slow.

Discussion in 'Heavy Duty Diesel Truck Mechanics Forum' started by skallagrime, Jan 9, 2021.

  1. skallagrime

    skallagrime Road Train Member

    3,856
    9,943
    Apr 10, 2012
    Indiana
    0
    Neither nose cone or even fairings, not my trailer, though I ran an open flat with it for a bit and that helped (.3 mpg) but not my trailer
     
  2. Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.

  3. AModelCat

    AModelCat Road Train Member

    29,221
    159,296
    Jul 7, 2015
    Canuckistan
    0
    T600 is far more aerodynamic than a W900 and that's probably where you're seeing most of the difference.
     
    baha and God prefers Diesels Thank this.
  4. skallagrime

    skallagrime Road Train Member

    3,856
    9,943
    Apr 10, 2012
    Indiana
    0
    Difference is closer to 12 cpm on about 80 k miles a year so 9600$/year but who's counting?
     
  5. Dave1837

    Dave1837 Road Train Member

    1,399
    4,343
    Nov 16, 2019
    Pennsylvania
    0
    Well, if it helps, I average 4.5 with my 485 Paccar, 3.55 22.5 18 spd across the Ohio pike, pulling a Conestoga with a nose cone. That's only going west though. Going east I'll avg 6.8 lol
     
    baha Thanks this.
  6. skallagrime

    skallagrime Road Train Member

    3,856
    9,943
    Apr 10, 2012
    Indiana
    0
    Even though the w9 has a negligible trailer gap and the stretched t600 (1994) has close to a 9 foot gap?

    It's possible, but Im quite skeptical of that
     
  7. AModelCat

    AModelCat Road Train Member

    29,221
    159,296
    Jul 7, 2015
    Canuckistan
    0
    Allegedly the T600 had a 20% increase in fuel economy over the W900 with similar powertrain. 20% of 5 mpg is 1 mpg.

    Kenworth T600 - Wikipedia
     
    baha, God prefers Diesels and magoo68 Thank this.
  8. Diesel Dave

    Diesel Dave Last Few of the OUTLAWS

    8,735
    25,098
    Jan 20, 2010
    Hesperia, Ca.
    0
    When I had my 379, 3406E, 5EK series, I had a tune with the B/W stage 1. I got 7 mpg all day long on the average, sometimes more(7.3, 7.5)sometimes just a little less(6.5, 6.8). I had all the power I needed and some. It sat behind a RTO 16913 with 3:36 on tall rubber(11.24.5)
     
    skallagrime Thanks this.
  9. skallagrime

    skallagrime Road Train Member

    3,856
    9,943
    Apr 10, 2012
    Indiana
    0
    You're missing the point, my t600 has enough room to park a car between the trailer and the back of the cab, the w9 doesn't, by that alone, you lose the advantage of the t600 aerodynamics
     
    Bean Jr. Thanks this.
  10. AModelCat

    AModelCat Road Train Member

    29,221
    159,296
    Jul 7, 2015
    Canuckistan
    0
  11. skallagrime

    skallagrime Road Train Member

    3,856
    9,943
    Apr 10, 2012
    Indiana
    0
    Any chance I can ask what your preferred speed was?

    Your pete sounds pretty dead on like what's in my t600 (which I like) I generally settle into 68 mph at roughly 1300 but it's longer wheelbase offsets the mpg savings it otherwise has on tall loads (my t600 tries never to pull a box)
    Main difference I see is I have short rubber 24.5s
     
  • Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.